The Effect of Export-Related Measures on Indonesian Export of Palm, CPO, and Its Derivative Products
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of Export-Related Measures (ERMs) imposed by the Government of Indonesia on the export volume and value of palm, Crude Palm Oil (CPO), and its derivatives products utilizing the export data of Indonesia to 194 destination countries in the 2011–2020 period. This study combined the dataset of ERMs from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) database and relevant Indonesian regulations. The results reveal that ERMs have a positive and significant effect on both the export volume and value of Indonesian palm, CPO, and its derivatives products. The price-raising effect or costs of ERMs in these products is relatively high, approximately 38.36%. However, the price-raising effect remains lower than the market-creating effect, as confirmed by the estimation results of indirect country characteristics. This study proposes a policy to strengthen the capacity of exporters to comply with ERMs and to harmonize the ERMs in Indonesia with import measures imposed by export destination countries.
References
[1] Arita, S, Beckman, J & Mitchell, L 2017, ’Reducing transatlantic barriers on U.S.-EU agri-food trade: What are the possible gains?’, Food Policy, vol. 68, pp. 233-247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.006.
[2] Asci, S, Koç, AA, & Erdem, S 2014, ’The impact of non-tariff measures on agro-food export between MENA countries and the EU’, SERMED 2014 Conference Papers (p. 34), Instituto Universitario de Análisis.
[3] Bao, X & Qiu, LD 2012, ’How do technical barriers to trade influence trade?’, Review of International Economics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 691-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2012.01047.x.
[4] Beghin, J & Xiong, B 2018, ’Trade and welfare effects of technical regulations and standards’, in Melo, JD & Nicita, A (eds.), Non-tariff measures: economic assessment and policy options for development (pp. 159-194), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
[5] Beghin, JC, Disdier, AC & Marette, S 2015, ’Trade restrictiveness indices in the presence of externalities: An application to non-tariff measures’, Canadian Journal of Economics/ Revue canadienne d’économique, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1513-1536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12157.
[6] Bergstrand, JH 1985, ’The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 474-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976.
[7] Cadot, O, Gourdon, J & Tongeren, FV 2018, ’Estimating ad valorem equivalents of non-tariff measures’, OECD Trade Policy Papers, 215, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/f3cd5bdcen.
[8] Cardamone, P 2011, ’The effect of preferential trade agreements on monthly fruit exports to the European Union’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 38, no.4, pp. 553-586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq052.
[9] Chen, MX, Otsuki, T & Wilson, JS 2006, ’Do standards matter for export success?’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3809, World Bank. viewed 8 August 2022, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/646391468340769662/pdf/wps3809.pdf.
[10] Chen, MX, Wilson, JS & Otsuki, T 2008, ’Standards and export decisions: Firm-level evidence from developing countries’, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 501-523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190802250027.
[11] Dal Bianco, A, Boatto, VL, Caracciolo, F & Santeramo, FG 2016, ’Tariffs and non-tariff frictions in the world wine trade’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 31-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv008.
[12] Devadason, ES 2011, ’Non-tariff measures in ASEAN: Barriers to intra-regional trade?’, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1950195.
[13] Disdier, AC & Fugazza, M 2020, A practical guide to the economic analysis of non-tariff measures, United Nations and World Trade Organization. doi: https://doi.org/10.18356/b9cc8a8d-en.
[14] Disdier, AC, Fontagné, L & Mimouni, M 2008, ’The impact of regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT agreements’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 336-350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01127.x.
[15] Ederington, J & Ruta, M 2016, ’Chapter 5 - Nontariff measures and the world trading system’, in Bagwell, K & Staiger, R (eds.), Handbook of Commercial Policy, Volume 1 Part B (pp. 211-277), Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.010.
[16] Edmonds, C, Croix, SL & Li, Y 2008, ’China trade: Busting gravity’s bounds’, Journal of Asian Economics, vol. 19, no. 5-6, pp. 455-466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.013.
[17] Egger, P 2000, ’A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation’, Economics Letters, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 25-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00183-4.
[18] Elisabeth, CR & Verico, K 2022, ’The effects of Indonesia’s technical barriers to trade on manufacturing exports: An empirical analysis using the pseudo-Poisson maximum likelihood method’, Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 160-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-08-2021-0045.
[19] Elisabeth, CR, Panennungi, MA, Verico, K & Ekananda, M 2020, ’Non-tariff measures on imported intermediate input: Empirical evidence from Indonesian manufacturing sector’, International Journal of Economics and Management, vol. 14, no.2, pp. 189-201.
[20] Ferro, E, Otsuki, T & Wilson, JS 2015, ’The effect of product standards on agricultural exports’, Food Policy, vol. 50, pp. 68-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.016.
[21] Fugazza, M 2013, ’The economics behind non-tariff measures: Theoretical insights and empirical evidence’, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, 57, United Nations. viewed 8 August 2022, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ itcdtab58_en.pdf.
[22] Ganslandt, M & Markusen, JR 2001, ’Standards and related regulations in international trade: A modeling approach’, NBER Working Paper, 8346, National Bureau of Economics Research. doi: 10.3386/w8346.
[23] Ghodsi, M, Grübler, J & Stehrer, R 2016, ’Estimating importer-specific ad valorem equivalent of non-tariff measures’, wiiw Working Paper, 129, Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche - The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. viewed 8 August 2022, https://www.wiiw.ac.at/ estimating-importer-specific-ad-valorem-equivalents-ofnon-tariff-measures-dlp-3971.pdf.
[24] Ghodsi, M, Grübler, J, Reiter, O & Stehrer, R 2017, ’The evolution of non-tariff measures and their diverse effects on trade’, wiiw Research Report, 419, Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche - The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. viewed 8 August 2022, https://wiiw.ac.at/the-evolution-of-non-tariff-measures-and-their-diverseeffects-on-trade-p-4213.html.
[25] Head, K & Ries, J 1999, ’Rationalization effects of tariff reductions’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 295-320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00019-1.
[26] Head, K & Mayer, T 2014, ’Chapter 3 - Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook’, in Gopinath, G, Helpman, E, & Rogoff, K (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, volume 4 (pp. 131-195), Elsevier. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3.
[27] Henson, S, Masakure, O & Cranfield, J 2011, ’Do fresh produce exporters in Sub-Saharan Africa benefit from global GAP certification’, World Development, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 375-386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.012.
[28] Ing, LY & Cadot, O 2017, ’Ad valorem equivalents of non-tariff measures in ASEAN’, ERIA Discussion Paper Series, ERIA-DP-2017-09, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. viewed 8 August 2022, https://www.eria.org/research/ad-valorem-equivalents-of-non-tariff-measures-in-asean/.
[29] Jaffee, S & Henson, S 2004, ’Standards and agro-food exports from developing countries: Rebalancing the debate’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3348, World Bank. doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3348.
[30] Jayasinghe, S, Beghin, JC & Moschini, GC 2010, ’Determinants of world demand for U.S. corn seeds: The role of trade costs’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 999-1010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq056.
[31] Josling, T, Roberts, D & Orden, D 2004, ’Food regulation and trade: Toward a safe and open global system - An overview and synopsis’, Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, August 1-4, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.20008.
[32] Kabir, M, Salim, R & Al-Mawali, N 2017, ’The gravity model and trade flows: Recent developments in econometric modeling and empirical evidence’, Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 56, pp. 60-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.08.005.
[33] Korinek, J, Melatos, M & Rau, M 2008, ’A review of methods for quantifyng the trade of standards in the agrifood sector’, OECD Trade Policy Papers, 79, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/235833787115.
[34] Krugman, PR, Obstfeld, M & Melitz, MJ 2018, International economics: theory and policy (11th edition), Pearson.
[35] Li, Y & Beghin, JC 2012, ’A meta-analysis of estimates of the impact of technical barriers to trade’, Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 497-511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.11.001.
[36] Liepina, R, Lapina, I & Mazais, J 2014, ’Contemporary issues of quality management: Relationship between conformity assessment and quality management’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 110, pp. 627-637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.907.
[37] Melitz, MJ 2003, ’The impact of trade on intraindustry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1695-1725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
[38] Melo, JD & Shepherd, B 2018, ’The economics of non-tariff measures: A primer’, in Melo, JD & Nicita, A (eds.), Nontariff measures: economic assessment and policy options for development (pp. 121-158), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
[39] Munadi, E 2019. ’Indonesian non-tariff measures: updates and insights’, in Doan, HTT & Rosenow, S (eds.), Nontariff measures in ASEAN-an update (pp. 67-84), Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
[40] Obado, J, Syaukat, Y & Siregar, H 2009, ’The impacts of export tax policy on the Indonesian crude palm oil industry’, Journal of International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107-119.
[41] Otsuki, T 2011, ’Effect of international standards certification on firm-level exports: An imposition of the control function approach’, OSIPP Discussion Paper 11E005, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University. viewed 8 August 2022, http://www.osipp.osaka-u.ac.jp/archives/DP/2011/DP2011E005.pdf.
[42] Pavcnik, N 2002, ’Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants’, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 245-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00205.
[43] Peterson, E, Grant, J, Roberts, D & Karov, V 2013, ’Evaluating the trade restrictiveness of phytosanitary measures on US fresh fruit and vegetable imports’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 842-858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat015.
[44] Rifin, A 2010, ’The effect of export tax on Indonesia’s Crude Palm Oil (CPO) export competitiveness’, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 173-184. doi: 10.1355/ae27-2b.
[45] Santeramo, FG 2019, ’On non-tariff measures and changes in trade routes: From North-North to South-South trade?’, IATRC Commissioned Paper, 22, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. viewed 8 August 2022, https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/287317/files/ IATRC%20CP22%20-%20Santeramo.pdf.
[46] Santeramo, FG & Lamonaca, E 2019, ’The effects of non-tariff measures on agri-food trade: A review and meta-analysis of empirical evidence’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 595-617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12316.
[47] Santeramo, FG, Lamonaca, E, Nardone, G & Seccia, A 2019, ’The benefits of country-specific non-tariff measures in world wine trade’, Wine Economics and Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 28-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2018.12.001.
[48] Sari, AR, Hakim, DB & Anggraeni, L 2014, ’Analisis pengaruh non-tariff measures ekspor komoditi Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Indonesia ke negara tujuan ekspor utama’, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembanguan, vol 3, no. 2, pp. 111- 135. doi: https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.3.2.2014.111-135.
[49] Silva, JMCS & Tenreyro, S 2006, ’The log of gravity’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 641-658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
[50] Sithamaparam, AG & Devadason, ES 2016, ’Do Non-tariff measures in the EU, Japan and the ASEAN matter for export consignments from Malaysia?’, Institutions and Economics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-25.
[51] Solleder, O 2013, ’Trade effects of export taxes’, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper, 08/2013, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. viewed 8 August 2022, https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/15643/.
[52] Stephenson, SM 1997, ’Standards, conformity assessment and developing countries’, Policy Research Working Papers, 1826, World Bank. viewed 8 August 2022, https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/640841468766532803/102502322_20041117162503/additional/multi-page.pdf.
[53] Swinnen, J 2016, ’Economics and politics of food standards, trade, and development’, Agricultural Economics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 7-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12316.
[54] Tinbergen, J 1962, Shaping the world economy. Suggestions for an international economic policy, The Twentieth Century Fund.
[55] Trefler, D 2004, ’The long and short of the Canada-US free trade agreement’, American Economic Review, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 870-895. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002633.
[56] UNCTAD 2019, International classification of non-tariff measures - 2019 version, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. doi: https://doi.org/10.18356/33bf0bc6-en.
[57] Vanzetti, D, Peters, R & Knebel, C 2016, ’Sand in the wheels: Non-tariff measures and regional integration in SADC’, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities, Study Series, 71, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. viewed 8 August 2022, https://unctad.org/publication/ sand-wheels-non-tariff-measures-and-regional-integrationsadc.
[58] WITS 2022, MFN simple average by country product from world in % 1988-2021: by country MFN simple average in percentage for all products world between 1988 and 2021, World Integrated Trade Solution, viewed 8 August 2022, https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/country/by-country/startyear/LTST/endyear/LTST/tradeFlow/Import/indicator/MFN-SMPL-AVRG/partner/WLD/product/Total.
[59] Wood, J, Wu, J, Li, Y & Jang, H 2017, ’The economic impact of SPS measures on agricultural exports to China: An empirical analysis using the PPML method’, Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 51. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020051.
[60] WTO 2012, World trade report 2012: Trade and public policies: A closer look at non-tariff measures in the 21st century, World Trade Organization. viewed 8 August 2022, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr12_e.htm.
[61] Xiong, B & Beghin, J 2014, ’Disentangling demandenhancing and trade-cost effects of maximum residue regulations’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1190-1203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12082.
[62] Zarzoso, IM & Lehmann, FN 2003, ’Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur- European union trade flows’, Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 291-316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2003.12040596.
Recommended Citation
Sipayung, Edy Krismanto and Elisabeth, Christina Ruth
(2023)
"The Effect of Export-Related Measures on Indonesian Export of Palm, CPO, and Its Derivative Products,"
Economics and Finance in Indonesia: Vol. 69:
No.
2, Article 3.
DOI: 10.47291/efi.2023.08
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/efi/vol69/iss2/3