2962-780X

No URL ">
  •  
  •  
 

Abstract

The study examines the challenges encountered in the implementation of the Vertical Land Consolidation (VLC) program, which primarily focuses on providing homes through the Kampung Improvement Program in Jakarta Province. VLC, or Vertical Land Consolidation, is an essential approach to improving the security of land ownership and the quality of housing in densely populated, degenerated metropolitan areas that face numerous obstacles. A significant challenge is the requirement for voluntary involvement from a minimum of 60% of people in the area, emphasizing the importance of bottom-up planning. The study was conducted in 2022 at Cipinang Besar Selatan (East Jakarta) using a case study methodology. The results indicate that the implementation of the program faces difficulties as a result of implementing top-down approaches and ongoing issues with tenure security. The study highlights the importance of combining top-down techniques with bottom-up community engagement to enhance the efficiency of VLC initiatives in urban kampungs, specifically in metropolitan locations like Jakarta.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji tantangan pada pelaksanaan program Konsolidasi Tanah Vertikal (KTV) untuk penyediaan rumah melalui Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU) di Provinsi Jakarta. KTV adalah pendekatan penting untuk meningkatkan keamanan kepemilikan tanah dan kualitas perumahan di daerah metropolitan yang padat dan terdegradasi. Tantangan utama pada pelaksanaan KTV adalah syarat persetujuan 60% dari masyarakat di lokasi KTV menekankan pentingnya perencanaan bottom-up. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada tahun 2022 di Cipinang Besar Selatan (Jakarta Timur) dengan menggunakan metode studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan program menghadapi kesulitan akibat penerapan perencanaan top-down dan masalah status kepemilikan tanah bagi masyarakat pasca program. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya menggabungkan perencanaan top-down dengan keterlibatan komunitas melalui perencanaan bottom-up untuk meningkatkan efisiensi dan inisiasi KTV di kampung-kampung kota, khususnya di lokasi metropolitan seperti Jakarta.

References

Adabre, M. A.A., Chan, A.P.C., Darko, A., Robert, O.K., Abidoye, R., Kumi, T. A. (2020). Critical barriers to sustainability attainment in affordable housing: International construction professionals’ perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 253, 119995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119995

Adianto, J., Okabe, A., Ellisa, E., Shima, N. (2016). The tenure security and its implication to self-help housing improvements in the urban Kampong: The case of Kampong Cikini, Jakarta. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 3: 50-65. https://doi.org/10.14398/urpr.3.50

Bennett, C. P. A., Ridwansyah, M., Siscawati, M., & Sommerville, M. (2019). Indonesia land tenure and property rights assessment. Washington, DC: USAID Integrated Land and Resource Governance Task Order under the Strengthening Tenure and Resource Rights II (STARR II) IDIQ

Charbonneau, B., & Parent, G. (2011). Peacebuilding, Memory and Reconciliation: Bridging Top-Down and Bottom-up Approaches. Taylor & Francis Group.

Directorate General Land Procurement and Land Development, Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency Republic of Indonesia (2022). Implementation of a KTV Pilot project in Cipinang Besar Selatan Village, Jatinegara District, East Jakarta, 2022. Unpublished.

Enjelina, Beyan, E.V.P., Rossy, A.G.C. (2023). A Review of AI Image Generator: Influences, Challenges, and Future Prospects for Architectural Field. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture. Vol: 2, pp. 53 – 65. https://ojs.uajy.ac.id/index.php/JARINA/article/view/6662

Firman, T. (2004). New Town Development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: A Perspective of Spatial Segregation. Habitat International, 28 (3), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00037-7

Isidiho, A. O., & Sabran, M. S. B. (2016). Evaluating the top-bottom and bottom-up community development approaches: Mixed method approach as alternative for rural un-educated communities in developing countries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 266-273. doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4p

Lefranc, S. (2011). A critique of “bottom-up” peacebuilding: Do peaceful individuals make peaceful societies? In Charbonneau, B., & Parent, G. (Eds.), Peacebuilding, Memory and Reconciliation: Bridging Top-Down and Bottom-up Approaches. Taylor & Francis Group.

O’Flynn, J., Buick, F., Blackman, D., & Halligan, J. (2011). You win some, you lose some: Experiments with joined-up government. International Journal of Public Administration, 34, 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2010.540703

Pissourios, I. A. (2014). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for the Use of Planning Standards. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0007

Pribadi, D. O., & Pauleit, S. (2015). The dynamics of peri-urban agriculture during rapid urbanization of Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area. Land Use Policy, 48, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.009

Sanga, N., Benson, O. G., & Josyula, L. (2021). Top-down processes derail bottom-up objectives: A study in community engagement and 'Slum-Free City Planning'. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab037

Rachman, N.F.. (2022). Urban Agrarian Reform: Forming ecological and social spaces with urban villages. Public Lectures for Special Settlement Topic Subjects. Depok: UI.

Supriatna, A., & Recio, R. R. (2023). The Role of Community Perception and State Recognition in Jakarta. In Roitman, S., & Rukmana, D (Eds.). Urban Routledge Handbook of Urban Indonesia (pp. 42 – 56). Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003318170-6

Download

Share

COinS