•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Physical activity is important because it has so many benefits. Even so, there are still many workers who are exposed to the risk of lack of physical activity. For this reason, it is necessary to know what affects the implementation of physical activity in workers. Quantitative design was used with a cross sectional study on 58 Cilegon Public Service Mall workers who met the criteria. As a result, 65.5% of workers are classified as active, 34.5% of workers are inactive and 12% of workers do not carry out any physical activity at all. Level of education (p value = 0.005), perceived benefits (P value = 0.01), friend support (p value = 0.014), body mass index (p value = 0.018), and family support (p value = 0.05) are the components that affect the implementation of physical activity in Cilegon Public Service Mall. Things that can be done to improve the implementation of physical activity include providing physical activity facilities, implementing group exercises, stretching instructions between work, and educating on physical activities. It is hoped that after conducting this research, the physical activity of Cilegon City Public Service Mall workers can be increased.

References

Bauman, A. E. et al. (2012) “Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not?,” The Lancet, 380(9838), hal. 258–271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1.

CDC. (2021a). Health Outcomes Measure Definitions. PLACES: Local Data for Better Health. https://www.cdc.gov/places/measure-definitions/health-outcomes/index.html#coronary-heart-disease

Cheah, Y. K. dan Poh, B. K. (2014) “The Determinants of Participation in Physical Activity in Malaysia,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 5(1), hal. 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2013.12.002.

Ding, D. et al. (2016) “The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases,” The Lancet, 388(10051), hal. 1311–1324. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X.

García-Fernández, J. et al. (2019) “Determinants of physical activity performed by young adults,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214061.

Gudnadottir, U. et al. (2019) “The relationship between occupational physical activity and self-reported vs measured total physical activity,” Preventive Medicine Reports, 15(October 2018), hal. 100908. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100908.

Harvard Medical School (2011) Benefits of exercise–reduces stress, anxiety and helps fight depression - Harvard Health Publications - Harvard Health. Tersedia pada: https://www.health.harvard.edu/press_releases/benefits-of-exercisereduces-stress-anxiety-and-helps-fight-depression (Diakses: 10 Maret 2023).

Hwang, J. dan Kim, Y. H. (2017) “Psychological , Social Environmental , and Physical Environmental Variables in Explaining Physical Activity in Korean Older Adults,” 26, hal. 83–92.

Ibrahim, S. et al. (2013) “Perceived physical activity barriers related to body weight status and sociodemographic factors among Malaysian men in Klang Valley,” BMC Public Health, 13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-275.

Kirk, M. A. dan Rhodes, R. E. (2011) “Occupation correlates of adults’ participation in leisure-time physical activity: A systematic review,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), hal. 476–485. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.015.

Lee, I. M. et al. (2012) “Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy,” The Lancet, 380(9838), hal. 219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9.

Macera, C. A., Hootman, J. M. dan Sniezek, J. E. (2003) “Major public health benefits of physical activity,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, 49(1), hal. 122–128. doi: 10.1002/art.10907.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2023. Walking-Working Surfaces and Personal Fall Protection Systems (Final Rule). [online] Tersedia di: https://www.osha.gov/walking-working-surfaces

Pender, N. J., Garcia, A. W., & Ronis, D. L. (1995). Health Promotion Model -Instruments to Measure HPM Behavioral Determinants : Exercise Social Support Scale (Adolescent Version). http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/85345

Riskesdas kemenkes RI, 2018. (2018). Laporan_Nasional_RKD2018_FINAL.pdf. In Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan (p. 674). http://labdata.litbang.kemkes.go.id/images/download/laporan/RKD/2018/Laporan_Nasional_RKD2018_FINAL.pdf

Sechrist, K. R., Walker, S. N., & Pender, N. J. (1987). Health Promotion Model - Instruments to Measure HPM Behavioral Determinants : Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale [EBBS] (Adult Version). http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/85354

Shibata, A. et al. (2009) “Psychological, social, and environmental factors to meeting physical activity recommendations among Japanese adults,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 6, hal. 60. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-60.

Trost, S. G. et al. (2002) “Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: Review and update,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34(12), hal. 1996–2001. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00020.

Washburn, L. (2020). Understanding the Health Belief Model. University of Tennessee, 4(2004), 4. https://extension.tennessee.edu/publications/Documents/W931-C.pdf

World Health Organization Geneva. (2005). Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ):Analysis guide. 23. https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/resources/GPAQ_Analysis_Guide.pdf

World Health Organization. (2020). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization.

WHO (2022) Physical activity. Tersedia pada: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (Diakses: 23 Februari 2023).

Bahasa Abstract

Aktivitas fisik merupakan hal penting dalam kehidupan karena memiliki banyak sekali manfaat. Walaupun begitu, masih banyak pekerja yang terpajan risiko kurang aktivitas fisik. Untuk itu, perlu diketahui komponen apa saja yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan aktivitas fisik pada pekerja Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Cilegon. Digunakan desain kuantitatif dengan studi cross sectional pada 58 pekerja Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Cilegon yang memenuhi kriteria. Hasilnya, 65,5% pekerja tergolong aktif, 34,5% pekerja tidak aktif dan 12% pekerja tidak melakukan aktivitas fisik sama sekali. Komponen yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan aktivitas fisik di Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Cilegon antara lain; tingkat pendidikan (p value = 0.005), perceived benefits (p value = 0.01), dukungan teman (p value = 0.014), indeks massa tubuh (p value = 0.018), dan dukungan keluarga (p value = 0.05). Hal yang dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan pelaksanaan aktivitas fisik antara lain penyediaan fasilitas olahraga, pelaksanaan senam bersama, instruksi peregangan di sela bekerja, dan edukasi aktivitas fisik yang bisa dilakukan. Harapannya setelah dilakukan penelitian ini, aktivitas fisik pekerja Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Cilegon dapat ditingkatkan.

Kata Kunci: aktivitas fisik, kurang aktivitas fisik, mal pelayanan publik kota Cilegon, pekerja perkantoran

Download

Share

COinS