•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Investigative professionalism constitutes a fundamental pillar of the criminal justice system; however, its realization is frequently constrained by institutional design and procedural limitations within oversight mechanisms. This article examines the role of the Investigation Supervision Bureau (Biro Pengawas Penyidikan (Birowassidik)) of the Criminal Investigation Agency (Badan Reserse Kriminal (Bareskrim)) of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in handling public complaints related to investigative performance. Rather than presuming the existence of a unified ‘Code of Silence’, this study adopts a qualitative critical analysis to assess the structural and procedural constraints inherent in Birowassidik’s mandate as a complaint-based supervisory institution. The analysis demonstrates that the low resolution rate of public complaints (34.1% as of December 2025) should not be interpreted as conclusive evidence of organizational collusion or subcultural loyalty, but instead reflects evidentiary dependency, jurisdictional fragmentation, and limitations in supervisory authority. Accordingly, the concept of the ‘Code of Silence’ is treated as an analytical hypothesis rather than an empirical conclusion. This study argues that strengthening investigative accountability requires a recalibration of governance expectations through enhanced procedural transparency, digital oversight mechanisms such as e-SP2HP, and clearer institutional coordination with other internal and external oversight bodies. Such an approach is essential to ensuring accountability that is both realistic and consistent with the principles of good governance and democratic legal certainty.

References

Ansell & Gash. 2007. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access. 

Berita Depok. 2025, November 14. Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Polri Meningkat Menjadi 76,2 Persen. Diakses pada laman: https://berita.depok.go.id/kepercayaan-publik-terhadap-polri-meningkat-menjadi-762-persen.

Betham. 1991. The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan Education Ltd. 

Biro Pengawas Penyidikan Bareskrim Polri. 2025, Desember 15. Anev Birowassidik. Data Internal Birowassidik. 

Bovens. 2007. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. Vol. 13, No. 4. European Law Journal.

Chan. 1997. Changing Police Culture: Policing in a Multicultural Society. Cambridge University Press. 

Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs.Free Press.

Cohen, A. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang . New York: Free Press.

Data Internal Polri. 2024, Oktober. Laporan Nilai Integritas Anggota Kepolisian: Studi Tentang Nilai Integritas, Deterrence & Code of Silence pada Anggota Kepolisian. 

Data Internal Polri Biro Pengawas Penyidikan Bareskrim Polri Tahun 2021 - 2024.

Data Internal Polri Detasemen A Biro Paminal Divpropam Polri 2022 - 2024.

Hamidi. 1999. Asas - Asas Umum Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan yang Layak (AAUPL). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hazard Jr. 1966. Review: Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. Vol.34, No.1. The University of Chicago Law Review. 

Kniep. 2023. The Code of Silence. 1st Ed. Routledge. 

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Masyarakat (LBHM). 2024, Juni 3. Tolak RUU POLRI (Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia) yang menjadikan POLRI Lembaga “Superbody”, dan Gagal Mendesain Perbaikan Fundamental. Diakses melalui laman: https://lbhmasyarakat.org/2024/06/#:~:text=Pada%202022%2C%20Polri%20tercatat%20sebagai,pada%202023%2C%20terdapat%20156%20laporan.&text=Ibid

Loader. 2000. Plural Policing and Democratic Governance. Vol. 9, No. 3. Social and Legal Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096466390000900301.

Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding power to account: Accountability in modern democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Paterson & Pollock. 2011. Policing and Criminology. Great Britain: Short Run Press Ltd.

Pembudi. 2023, Januari 20. Mengenal Budaya Organisasi dalam Perusahaan. Diakses pada laman: https://unicimi.ac.id/mengenal-budaya-organisasi-dalam-perusahaan/

Perubahan Atas Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2017 Tentang Susunan Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Satuan Organisasi Pada Tingkat Markas Besar Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Punch. 2009. Police Corruption: Deviance, Accountability and Reform in Policing. Vol. 4, No. 4. Mannheim Centre for Criminology. 

Reiner. 2010. The Politics of the Police: 4th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Sedarmayanti. 2004. Good Governance. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.

Skolnick. 1966. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

Susanto, I.S. 2011. Kriminologi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Undang - Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. 

Undang - Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Widijowati & Batubara. 2022. Reconstruction of the Paradigm of Other Actions and Police Discretion to Minimize Potential Disparities in Fair Law Enforcement. Vol. 5, No. 1. ENDLESS: International Journal of Future Studies. 

Widijowati & Charisma. 2025. Challenges to Investigator Professionality in Law Enforcement: A Rule of Law and Good Governance Perspective. Vol. 19, No. 3. KRTHA Bhayangkara. 

Yukl. 2013. Leadership in Organizations. Global Edition. New York: Pearson.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.