•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Public trust in the Indonesian National Police (Polri) has experienced significant fluctuations due to allegations of misconduct, corruption, and excessive use of force. This study examines the relationship between public trust and compliance with Polri authority, particularly in the context of strained police-community relations. Drawing on procedural justice and restorative regulation theories, the research argues that trust directly influences voluntary compliance and that procedural justice alone is insufficient to repair legitimacy deficits. Instead, a dual model combining procedural fairness with restorative reconciliation, including acknowledgment of past harms and community dialogue is proposed as a more effective strategy for rebuilding trust. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study analyses national survey data on public trust in Polri alongside qualitative insights from community-police engagement initiatives. The findings suggest that while instrumental compliance (fear-based adherence) persists in low-trust environments, normative compliance (voluntary cooperation) is stronger where procedural justice and restorative practices are implemented. Additionally, the study explores variations in compliance across different social groups, applying Hirschi’s (1969) Social Bond Theory to explain divergent responses to police authority. The study contributes to policing legitimacy literature by demonstrating the need for context-sensitive reforms in post-authoritarian societies like Indonesia. It recommends integrating procedural justice training, community dialogues, public apologies for past injustices, and transparent accountability mechanisms to foster sustainable compliance. Future research should empirically test the proposed dual model in diverse Indonesian communities to refine its applicability.

References

Adhikara, R., Putranto, P. Y., & Gurion, A. B. (2024). In pursuit for legitimacy: An overview of contemporary policing in Indonesia. Eduvest: Journal of Universal Studies, 4(2), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i2.1069

Bartlett, C. (2023). This is how you build trust with Indonesia’s police. 360. https://360info.org/this-is-how-you-build-trust-with-indonesias-police/ (Accessed March 1, 2025)

Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 102(1), 119–170.

Braithwaite, J., Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2008). Shame, restorative justice, and crime. In Taking stock. Routledge.

Braithwaite, V. (2017). Closing the gap between regulation and the community. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory theory (pp. 25–42). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/RT.02.2017.02

Davies, S. G., Meliala, A., & Buttle, J. (2016). Gangnam style versus Eye of the Tiger: People, police and procedural justice in Indonesia. Policing and Society, 26(4), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.949712

Glascock, J. (2023). Relationship of media usage to attitudes toward police. Communication Quarterly, 71(5), 568–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2239314

Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press. http://archive.org/details/causesofdelinque00hirs (Accessed March 12, 2025)

Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2024). Tingkat kepercayaan publik terhadap lembaga penegak hukum dan politik. INDIKATOR. https://indikator.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/RILIS-INDIKATOR-23-JANUARI-2024.pdf

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., & Murray, D. K. (2010). Compliance with the law and policing by consent: Notes on police and legal legitimacy. In Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203113998

Kepolisian Resor (Polres) Ciamis. (2021, December 5). Kepercayaan masyarakat kepada Polri naik jadi 80,2%. Situs Resmi Polres Ciamis. https://tribratanewspolresciamis.com/2021/12/05/kepercayaan-masyarakat-kepada-polri-naik-jadi-802/ (Accessed October 2, 2024)

Murphy, K. (2017). Procedural justice and its role in promoting voluntary compliance. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory theory (pp. 45–58). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/RT.02.2017.03

O’Brien, T. C., Meares, T. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2020). Reconciling police and communities with apologies, acknowledgements, or both: A controlled experiment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220904659

O’Brien, T. C., & Tyler, T. R. (2019). Rebuilding trust between police & communities through procedural justice & reconciliation. Behavioral Science, 5(1). https://behavioralpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Rebuilding-trust-between-police-communities-through-procedural-justice-reconciliation.pdf (Accessed August 5, 2024)

Rogers, A., Hine, K., & Prenzler, T. (2024). Understanding the decline: A procedural justice approach to the key factors behind the downward shift in opinions of police. Criminal Justice Studies, 37(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2024.2329955

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x

Wibowo, I. (2022). Indonesian police face loss of trust crisis. Maritime Fairtrade. https://maritimefairtrade.org/indonesian-police-face-loss-of-trust-crisis/ (Accessed August 5, 2024)

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.