Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat pengaruh dan besaran berbagai variabel kesehatan dan kualitas kehidupan kerja terhadap kinerja perawat di Rumah Sakit Umum (RSU) Tangerang. Variabel kesehatan tersebut meliputi sejarah kesehatan keluarga, lingkungan kehidupan, perilaku gaya hidup, dan status kesehatan perawat. Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain potong lintang. Data dianalisis dengan pendekatan Structural Equation Model (SEM) menggunakan software Smart-PLS. Populasi yang diamati adalah perawat yang bertugas di semua pelayanan RSU Tangerang dengan 250 perawat terpilih sebagai sampel yang dilakukan secara multistage random sampling. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kinerja perawat di RSU Tangerang dipengaruhi oleh semua variabel, yang berarti model teoritis yang diusulkan pada penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai variabel prediktor. Pada model, variabel kualitas kehidupan kerja perawat merupakan variabel prediktor terbesar yang memengaruhi kinerja perawat. Dengan demikian, variabel kinerja perawat dipengaruhi oleh banyak variabel dengan pengaruh yang relatif kecil (6,16%). Intervensi terhadap semua variabel yang ditawarkan pada penelitian ini akan memberikan hasil yang kecil terhadap kinerja perawat sehingga memerlukan intervensi tambahan pada variabel lain.

This study aims to see the effect and magnitude of health variables and variable of the quality of work life on the performance of nurses working in Tangerang General Hospital. Health variables include family medical history, living environment, lifestyle behaviors, and health status. Crosssectional method used in this study. Data were analyzed with the approach to Structural Equation Model (SEM) using software Smart-PLS. In this study nurses who serve in all services at Tangerang General Hospital was chosen as the unit of analysis with 250 nurses was selected as the samples and multistage random sampling were used. The results of the analysis showed that the performance of nurses in Tangerang General Hospital was influenced by all the variables which means that the theoretical model proposed in this study can be used. The quality of work life of nurse was the greatest predictor variables in the model that affect the performance of nurses. Thus, this study concluded that the variable performance of nurses is affected by many variables with its influence was relatively small (6,16%). Therefore all the variables offered in this study will intervene not large enough results to produce an excellent performance of the nurses at Tangerang General Hospital and required additional intervention efforts on other variables.

References

  1. Cherry B, Jacob SR. Contemporary nursing: issues, trends, and management. 3rd ed. Elsevier M; 2005. [cited 2009 April 12]. Available from: http://evolve.elsevier.com.
  2. Clark RE. The economic benefits of supported employment for persons with mental illness. J. Mental Health Policy Econ. 2008; 187: 63–7.
  3. Cole MA, Neumayer MA. The impact of poor health on total factor productivity. Journal of Development Studies. 2006 August [cited 2009 April 20]; 42 (6): [about 12 p]. Available from: http://imformaworld.com.
  4. Budiharto. Pengantar ilmu perilaku kesehatan dan pendidikan kesehatan gigi. Jakarta: EGC; 2010.
  5. Ulrich BT. Healthy work environments. Critical Care Nurses’ Work Environments 2008: A Follow-up Report. Critical Care Nurse. 2009 April [cited 2009 August 14]; 29 (2). Available from: http://www.ccnonline.org.
  6. Green L. Precede-proceed model of health program planning and evaluation: new features and updated citations in new 4th edition of health program planning “an educational and ecological approach”. 2005 [cited 2010 July 27]. Available from: http://www.lgreen.net.
  7. Robbins SP. Organizational behavior: human behavior at work. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Pearson Education Inc; 2003.
  8. Barnum BS, Karlene M, Kerfoot KM. The nurse as executive. 7th ed. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 2005.
  9. Kivimäki MP, Voutilainen P, Koskinen P. Job enrichment, work motivation, and job satisfaction in hospital wards: testing the job characteristics model. J Nursing Management, 2008; 310: 87–91.
  10. Community Health Improvement Partner. Community health: a different perspective of conceptual model of the community. 2001 [cited 2010 July 28]. Available from: http://sandiegohealth.org.
  11. Robert LM, John HJ. Human resources management. Salemba Empat: Jakarta; 2006.
  12. Nasri SM. Modul kuliah K3 dasar program strata dua (s2) magister kesehatan masyarakat kelas e-learning. Depok: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia; 2009.
  13. Rumah Sakit Umum Tangerang. Profil rumah sakit umum Tangerang tahun 2010. Tangerang: Rumah Sakit Umum Tangerang; 2010.
  14. Ghozali I. Structural equation modelling: metode alternatif dengan partial least square (pls). 2nd ed. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang; 2008.
  15. Hafizurrachman. Health status, ability, and motivation influenced district hospital nurse performance. Medical Journal of Indonesia. 2009; 18 (4): 283-9.
  16. Gifford DB, Zammuto RF, Goodman EA, Hill KS. The relationship between hospital unit culture and nurses’ quality of work life. J Healthcare Management. 2007; 247: 281-4.
  17. Health Indicators 82-221-XIE. Health status. Health Indicators. 2001 [cited 2009 August 12]; 3. Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pb.

Download

Share

COinS