•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Indonesia’s 2025 accession to BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) appears at odds with the country’s long-standing bebas-aktif (“free and active”) tradition of non-alignment. This article explains the move through a layered realist approach and a purely theoretical, deductive method. First, the study integrates structural, offensive, and neoclassical realism to clarify four key mechanisms external balancing, hedging, relative gains, and status-seeking. It then maps propositions about what BRICS can offer Indonesia and tests them against existing realist scholarship on middle powers and emerging-power clubs. Analysis shows that BRICS chiefly serves as an external-balancing instrument, reducing Jakarta’s reliance on Western-centric institutions. Although any state can purchase shares in the New Development Bank (NDB), full BRICS membership ensures larger voting power over lending policy, enhancing Indonesia’s leverage while still granting access to faster, less conditional finance. Intra-BRICS technology partnerships and China-led Belt and Road projects promise additional relative gains, reinforcing economic and strategic autonomy. At home, membership boosts symbolic status, validating elite ambitions and a developmental-nationalist narrative. Yet Jakarta’s engagement remains deliberately shallow: it taps BRICS where pay-offs are high and keeps exit options open to avoid over-dependence on any single great power. The findings confirm core realist expectations: middle powers exploit an increasingly diversified institutional landscape to hedge against post-unipolar uncertainty and to bargain for better terms. Influence in today’s system accrues to actors that supply flexible, mutually reinforcing institutional choices rather than rigid blocs.

References

A, M. G. M., Suharto, P., & Suhirwan, S. (2024). A Study of Indonesian Perspectives on the Future of the South China Sea: Navigating the Dynamics of Asymmetric Warfare. Journal on Education, 6(2), 12672–12679. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.5087

Acharya, A. (2016). Studying the Bandung conference from a Global IR perspective. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1168359

Ali, S., Hussain, T., Zhang, G., Nurunnabi, M., & Li, B. (2018). The Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in “BRICS” Countries. Sustainability, 10(7), 2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072513

Armijo, L. E., & Roberts, C. (2014). The emerging powers and global governance: Why the BRICS matter. In Handbook of emerging economies (pp. 502–524). Routledge.

Asep Setiawan. (2025). Indonesia’s Joins BRICS: Balancing Economic Opportunities and Geopolitical Challenges in a Multipolar World. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1567

Berger, M. T. (1997). Old state and new empire in Indonesia: Debating the rise and decline of Suharto’s New Order. Third World Quarterly, 18(2), 321–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599714975

Berger, M. T., & Beeson, M. (1998). Lineages of liberalism and miracles of modernisation: The World Bank, the East Asian trajectory and the international development debate. Third World Quarterly, 19(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599814361

Biziwick, M., Cattaneo, N., & Fryer, D. (2015). The rationale for and potential role of the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement. South African Journal of International Affairs, 22(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2015.1069208

Bull, B., & Bøa§s, M. (2003). Multilateral Development Banks as Regionalising Actors: The Asian Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank. New Political Economy, 8(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460307176

Dent, C. M. (2008). The Asian Development Bank and Developmental Regionalism in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, 29(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802052714

Do, T. T. (2017). “Firm in principles, flexible in strategy and tactics”: Understanding the logic of Vietnam’s China policy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891116677350

Fels, E. (2017). Theoretical Framework: Realism as a Lens for Analysis. In E. Fels, Shifting Power in Asia-Pacific? (pp. 85–152). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45689-8_2

Freddy, H. J., & Thomas, C. J. (2023). Status Competition: The BRICS’ Quest for Influence in Global Governance. China Report, 59(4), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455231187054

Gajinov, D. (2024). Economic integration processes in East Asia—Results, opportunities and challenges. Glasnik Srpskog Geografskog Drustva, 104(1), 141–182. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSGD2401141G

Grenville, S. (2004). The IMF and the Indonesian crisis. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 40(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007491042000205213

Gu, J., Renwick, N., & Xue, L. (2018). The BRICS and Africa’s search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development. Energy Policy, 120, 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.028

Haacke, J. (2019). The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia: A critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), 375–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcz010

Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171

Jones, L. (2010). ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 23(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2010.495996

Kirshner, J. (2012). The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110373949

Kuik, C.-C. (2021). Getting hedging right: A small-state perspective. China International Strategy Review, 3(2), 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5

Kuik, C.-C., Idris, N. A., & Nor, A. R. M. (2012). The China Factor in the U.S. “Reengagement” With Southeast Asia: Drivers and Limits of Converged Hedging. Asian Politics & Policy, 4(3), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01361.x

Lakshmi, A. A., & Mariska, D. (2024). Indonesia and Russia launch first joint naval drills. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/113b8345-0ee9-47be-a98f-b15ec25c500b

Lee, B. T. F., Bettani, S. A., Sims, J. P., & Lee, Y.-T. (2024). Southeast Asia as a Latent Kingmaker in the US-China Rivalry. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 10(1).

Lee, B. T. F., Darke, W., & Schubert, J.-N. F. (2024). China’s Global Governance as a Tool for Accelerating International Sustainable Development and Pandemic Security. China Report, 60(4), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455241288047

Lee, B. T. F., Dinh, L. D., Sims, J. P., & Bettani, S. A. (2025). ASEAN Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA): Implications for Digital Trade and Regional Economic Integration. Journal of Strategic and Global Studies, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jsgs.v8i1.1166

Lee, B. T. F., Kornphetcharat, K., Sims, J. P., Linh Dieu, D., & Salman Ali, B. (2025). ASEAN Cybersecurity Cooperation Strategy: Combating Cyber Terrorism and Hackers Through CERT Coordination. International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP), 7(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0701.788

Lee, B. T. F., & Sims, J. P. (2024a). Legitimacy through Diversity: China’s Leadership in the BRICS+ Expansion for Global Balance. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00411-6

Lee, B. T. F., & Sims, J. P. (2024b). The BRICS+ Expansion, Global Trade Dynamics, and the Dedollarization Phenomenon. Unnes Political Science Journal, 8(1).

Lee, B. T. F., Sims, J. P., & Lee, Y.-T. (2024). Navigating the Security Dilemma in the South China Sea: Lessons from Israeli-Palestinian and Russo-Ukrainian Conflicts. In Edited Volume on The Dynamics in the Indo-Pacific: From Geopolitics and Geoeconomics Perspectives (pp. 61–72). The Habibie Center.

Lee, B. T. F., Sims, J. P., & Lee, Y.-T. (2025). BRICS Expansion: Threat or Opportunity for ASEAN? India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 09749284251328226. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284251328226

Mazenda, A., & Ncwadi, R. (2016). The rise of BRICS development finance institutions: A comprehensive look into the New Development Bank and the Contingency Reserve Arrangement. AFRICAN EAST-ASIAN AFFAIRS, 0(3). https://doi.org/10.7552/0-3-178

Meibauer, G. (2023). Neorealism, neoclassical realism and the problem(s) of history. International Relations, 37(2), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178211033943

Mohamad, A., Sifat, I. M., Mohd Thas Thaker, H., & Noor, A. M. (2021). On IMF debt and capital control: Evidence from Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines and South Korea. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-08-2019-0108

Ouyang, H., Li, C., Liu, G., Zhang, M., & Lee, B. T. F. (2022). Development Zones and Firm Innovation: Evidence from Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 10(04). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748122500282

Ramcharan, R. (2000). ASEAN and non-interference: A principle maintained. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 60–88.

Robison, R., & Rosser, A. (1998). Contesting reform: Indonesia’s new order and the IMF. World Development, 26(8), 1593–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00056-4

Sims, J. P., Lee, Y.-T., & Lee, B. T. F. (2023). New Chinese Economic Policy to Latin America? A QCA Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-023-00244-w

Suhartono, H., & Salna, K. (2019). Indonesia Has a Grand $412 Billion Plan to Rebuild the Country. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-16/indonesia-has-a-412-billion-plan-to-rebuild-the-country

Sukma, R. (1997). Indonesia’sbebas‐aktifforeign policy and the ‘security agreement’ with Australia. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719708445212

Suoneto, N., & Lee, B. T. F. (2024). Asean won’t become obsolete just because a few members join Brics. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/opinion/asia-opinion/article/3284952/asean-wont-become-obsolete-just-because-few-members-join-brics

Toft, P. (2005). John J. Mearsheimer: An offensive realist between geopolitics and power. Journal of International Relations and Development, 8(4), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800065

Wang, H. (2019). The New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: China’s Ambiguous Approach to Global Financial Governance. Development and Change, 50(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12473

Wigell, M. (2016). Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: Neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism. Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0442-x

Wilson, J. D. (2017). The evolution of China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: From a revisionist to status-seeking agenda. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx015

Würdemann, A. I. (2018). The BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement: A Subversive Power Against the IMF’s Conditionality? The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 19(3), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340099

Ye, F. (2023). The New Development Bank and the structure of the multilateral development financial system. Review of Development Economics, 27(3), 1957–1972. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12995

Yuan, C., & Lee, B. T. F. (2023a). ASEAN in the Conflict Management of the Rohingya Crisis. Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies, 7, 39–60.

Yuan, C., & Lee, B. T. F. (2023b). EXPLORING CHINA’S RESPONSE TO THE ROHINGYA CRISIS: A LIBERAL PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Terrorism Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jts.v5i1.1056

Yuan, C., & Lee, B. T. F. (2023c). FROM RIVALS TO PARTNERS: THE EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION AMONG CHINA, JAPAN, AND KOREA. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v25i1.1267

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.