Apakah Penerapan Desentralisasi Memberikan Dampak yang tidak Baik? Studi Permukiman Kumuh di Jabodetabek

Authors

Meila Husna, Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas IndonesiaFollow
Muhammad Halley Yudhistira, Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas IndonesiaFollow

Abstract

The implementation of decentralization should have a positive impact on regional progress. Since its implementation in 2001, decentralization in Indonesia has become deeper and wider. Using the slum settlement policy as a study approach, this study will examine the impact of decentralization and how persistent these impacts are. The estimation results using RD-DiD shows that the implementation of decentralization has a negative correlation with the arrangement of slums in the Jabodetabek area. The area of slums is 45% greater than the year before decentralization or a non-decentralized area. Thus, in the aspect of structuring the slums, it can be concluded that decentralization does not work effectively and even tends to make things worse.

Bahasa Abstract

Penerapan desentralisasi seharusnya memberikan dampak yang positif pada kemajuan daerah. Sejak penerapannya tahun 2001, desentralisasi di Indonesia semakin dalam dan luas diterapkan. Menggunakan kebijakan penataan permukiman kumuh sebagai pendekatan studi akan dilihat dampak dari desentralisasi dan seberapa persisten dampak tersebut hadir. Hasil estimasi dengan menggunakan RD-DiD menunjukkan bahwa penerapan desentralisasi berkorelasi negatif dengan penataan permukiman kumuh di kawasan Jabodetabek. Luas permukiman kumuh lebih besar 45% dibandingkan dengan tahun sebelum desentralisasi atau daerah yang tidak terdesentralisasi. Dengan demikian dalam aspek penataan permukiman kumuh desentralisasi dapat dikatakan tidak berjalan efektif bahkan cenderung membuat keadaan lebih buruk.

References

Bahl, R., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Wallace, S. (2002). State Local Government Choices in Fiscal Redistribution. National Tax Journal, 723-742.

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 185-205.

Collins, William J., and Katharine L. Shester. (2013). Slum Clearance and Urban Renewal in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5 (1): 239-73.

Dell, M. (2010). The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining MITA. Journal of Econometrica, 1863-1903.

Desai, V. (2012). Urbanisation and Housing for The Poor: Overview. Journal of Welfare/Well-being, 212-218.

Hankla, C. R. (2009). When Is Fiscal Decentralization Good for Governance? Journal of Federalism , 632-650.

Hill, H., & Vidyattama, Y. (2016). Regional Development Dynamics in Indonesia Before and After The 'Big Bang' Decentralization. The Singapore Economic Review, 1-26.

Lewis, B. (1998). The Impact of Public Infrastructure on Municipal Economic Development: Empirical Results from Kenya. Review of Urban and Regional and Development Studies, 142-156.

Lucci, P., Bhatkal, T., & Khan, A. (2018). Are We Underestimating Urban Poverty?. Journal of World Development, 297-310.

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. 8th Edition, London: MacMillan

Miller, M. A. (2013). Decentralizing Indonesian City Spaces as New 'Centers'. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 834-848.

Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development. (2008). A Situation Analysis of Slums in Uganda and National Slum Upgrading Strategy and Action Plan. Kampala: Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development.

Nolan, L. B. (2015). Slum Definitions in Urban India: Implications for The Measurement of Health Inequalities. Population and Development Review, 59-84.

Parry, T. (1997). Achieving Balance in Decentralization: A Case Study of Education Decentralization in Chile. World Development, 211-225.

Rodden, J. (2002). The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance Around The World. American Journal of Political Science, 670-687.

Shenoy, A. (2017). Regional Development Through Place-Based Policy: Evidence from a Spatial Discontinuity. Journal of Development Economics, 173-189.

Smoke, P. (2006). Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries. In Y. Bangura, & G. Larbi, Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

Sumarto, S., Vothknecht, M., & Wijaya, L. (2014). Explaining The Regional Heterogeneity of Poverty: Evidence from Decentralized Indonesia. Jakarta: The SMERU Research Institute.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Pasal 18

Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2014

Undang-Undang No. 29 Tahun 2007

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision

Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zhang, F., Zhang, C., & Hudson, J. (2018). Housing Conditions and Life Satisfactions in Urban China. Journal of Cities, 35-44.

Zhang, Y. (2017). The Credibility of Slums: Informal Housing and Urban Governance in India. Journal of Land Use Policy, 1-15

Recommended Citation

Husna, Meila and Yudhistira, Muhammad Halley (2022) "Apakah Penerapan Desentralisasi Memberikan Dampak yang tidak Baik? Studi Permukiman Kumuh di Jabodetabek," Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi: Vol. 17: No. 1, Article 13.
DOI: 10.21002/jke.2022.05
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jke/vol17/iss1/13