Abstract
Creative economy has been assigned as the backbone of Indonesian economy in the future. Based on Article 24 of the 2019 Law of Creative Economy, the protection of Intellectual Property Rights upholds an important role in creative economy. This research aims to observe the impact of intellectual property rights to the performance of creative economy as measured by the total income and export decision of creative economy actors, using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) analytical method. It uses the cross-section data sourced from Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS)/Central Bureau of Statistics in 2016. This research concludes that the ownership of Intellectual Property Rights by economy actors has yielded significantly positive impact to the total income and export decision of creative economy actors.
Bahasa Abstract
Ekonomi kreatif ditetapkan pemerintah sebagai tulang punggung perekonomian Indonesia di masa mendatang. Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual memiliki peran penting di dalamnya. Penelitian ini mencoba untuk melihat bagaimana pengaruh hak kekayaan intelektual terhadap kinerja ekonomi kreatif yang diukur dengan total pendapatan dan keputusan ekspor pelaku ekonomi kreatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis Ordinary Least Square (OLS). Data yang digunakan adalah data cross section yang bersumber dari Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) tahun 2016. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah kepemilikan HKI oleh pelaku ekonomi kreatif berdampak positif secara signifikan terhadap pendapatan dan keputusan ekspor pelaku ekonomi kreatif.
References
Agostini, Filippini, dan Anna Nosella. (2014). Protecting intellectual property to enhance firm performance: does it work for SMEs?, 14; 1-10
Ayyagari, Meghana, Alis Demirgüç-Kunt, and Vojislav Maksimovic. (2010). Formal versus Informal Finance: Evidence from China. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 48–97
Bollen, Laury dkk. (2005). Linking Intellectual Capital and Intellectual Property to Company Performance. Management Decision, 43, 1161-1185
Brem, Nylund, dan Emma Hitchen. (2017). Open innovation and intellectual property rights: How do SMEs benefit from patents, industrial designs, trademarks and copyrights?, 6: 1285-1306
Brenner, M.S. and B.M. Rushton. (1989). Sales Growth and R&D in the Chemical Industry. Research-Technology Management, 32, 8- 15
Burke, Andrew dan Stuart Fraser. (2012). Self-employment: the role of intellectual property right laws. Small Business Economics, 4: 819-833
Cardi, Cristiana; Mazzoli, Camilla; Severini, Sabrina. (2019). People have the power: post IPO effects of intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of Economics and Finance; 43
Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signaling with board structures. The Academy of Management Journal, 28, 432–446
Chandra, Rajshree. (2009). Intellectual Property Rights: Excluding Other Rights of Other People. Economic and Political Weekly, 31: 86-93
Drennan, Judy dan Janet R. McColl-Kennedy. (2003). The relationship between Internet use and perceived performance in retail and professional service firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 295-311
Fisk, Catherine. (2011). The Role of Private Intellectual Property Rights in Markets for Labor and Ideas: Screen Credit and the Writers Guild of America, 1938-2000. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 2: 215-278
Grimes, Arthur dkk. (2012). The need for speed: impacts of internet connectivity on firm productivity. J Prod Anal, 37, 187-201
Isik, Unal, dan Yener Unal. (2017). The Effect Of Firm Size on Profitability: Evidence From Turkish Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6: 301-308
Lee, Jim. (2009). Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms, 2: 189-203
Liao, Tung-Shan dan John Rice. (2010). Innovation investments, market engagement and financial performance: A study among Australian manufacturing SMEs. Research Policy, 39, 117-125
Maskus, Keith dan Lei Yang. (2009). Intellectual property rights, technology transfer and exports in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 90: 231–236
Mate, Domician, dkk. (2016). The Impacts of Trademarks and Patents on Labour Productivity in the Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Sectors. Amfiteatru Economic, 18: 104-119
Mondal, Debasis dan Manash Ranjan Gupta. (2007). Intellectual property rights protection and unemployment in a North South model: A theoretical analysis. Economic Modelling, 25: 463–484
Morbey, G. K. (1989). R&D Expenditures and Profit Growth. Research-Technology Management, 32, 20-23
Moslehi, A., Mohaghar, A., Tamizi, A., & Bayati, S. (2006). Intellectual Capital and Export Development, an examination in four service Industries. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.
Oliveira, Juliana Albuquerquer S. dkk. (2018). Innovation and financial performance of companies doing business in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2, 153-164
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 45 Tahun 2016 Tentang Jenis dan Tarif Atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak yang Berlaku Pada Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 Tentang Badan Ekonomi Kreatif
Peraturan Presiden Tentang Rencana Induk Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif (Rindekraf) Nasional Tahun 2018-2025
Rajagopalan, N. dan Datta, D. K. (1996). CEO characteristics: Does industry matter? The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 197–215
Rho, Sungho dan Sehwan Oh. (2017). A Study on Innovation Activities of Export Firms and their Use of Intellectual Property Rights. International lnformation lnstitute, 10: 7789-7600
Robinson, Joan. (1953). The Production Function and The Theory of Capital. The Review of Economic Studies, 21,81-106
Saidu, Sani. (2019). CEO characteristics and firm performance: focus on origin, education and ownership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, 1-15
Salim, Ruhul, dkk. (2014). Do the Intellectual Property Rights of Importers Matter for Promoting Australian Exports?. The Australian Economic Review, 3: 279–289
Samsudin, Dadan. (2016). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dan Manfaatnya Bagi Lembaga Litbang. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Smith, Michele dan Frederick Hansen. (2002). Managing Intellectual Property: A Strategic Point of View. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 366-374
Stewart, Thomas A. (1999). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday
Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten
Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis
Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif
Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta
Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 Tentang Rahasia Dagang
Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Industri
Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2000 Tentang Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu
Vilcu, Alina-Daniela dan Gabriel-Eduard Vilcu. (2019). On Quasi-Homogeneous Production Functions. Symetry, 11, 976
Wagner, Joachim. (1995). Exports, firm size, and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, 7, 29-39
Zerenler, M. and Gozlu, S. (2008). Impact of intellectual capital on exportation performance: research on the Turkish automotive supplier industry. Journal of Transnational Management, 13, 318-41.
Recommended Citation
Ananda, Dzaki Yudi and Yudhistira, M. Halley
(2021)
"Kepemilikan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Kinerja Sektor Ekonomi Kreatif di Indonesia,"
Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi: Vol. 16:
No.
1, Article 2.
DOI: 10.21002/jke.2021.01
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jke/vol16/iss1/2
Included in
Economics Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons