•  
  •  
 
Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi

Abstract

This study compares the impact of budget allocations between regions that have carried out direct regional elections and indirectly and their impact on regional per capita income. The budget allocation uses the allocation of capital expenditure and indirect expenditure on the Regional Expenditure Budget (APBD) of regencies and cities in Indonesia. Empirically, in the 2005-2010 period in Indonesia, the estimation results using Pooled Least Square did not show a significant difference in the impact of budget allocation on regional per capita income between the regime and direct versus indirect elections. But regionally there are significant differences in districts and cities in the island group of Sumatra when compared with other island groups in Indonesia, namely there are differences in the impact on the total budget that affects the per capita income where the average head of the region elected through the direct election impacts lower than indirectly selected regional heads.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini membandingkan dampak alokasi anggaran antara daerah yang telah melaksanakan pemilihan kepala daerah secara langsung dengan tidak langsung dan dampaknya terhadap pendapatan per kapita daerah. Alokasi anggaran menggunakan alokasi belanja modal dan belanja tidak langsung pada Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah (APBD) kabupaten dan kota di Indonesia. Secara empiris pada kurun waktu 2005-2010 di Indonesia hasil estimasi dengan menggunakan Pooled Least Square tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan dampak alokasi anggaran terhadap pendapatan per kapita daerah antara rezim dengan pilkada langsung versus tidak langsung. Namun secara regional terjadi perbedaan signifikan di kabupaten dan kota pada kelompok pulau Sumatera bila dibandingkan dengan kelompok pulau lainnya di Indonesia, yaitu terdapat perbedaan dampak pada total anggaran yang berpengaruh terhadap pendapatan per kapita di mana secara rata-rata kepala daerah yang dipilih melalui pilkada langsung dampaknya lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan kepala daerah yang dipilih secara tidak langsung.

References

Acemoglu, D, S Naidu, P Restrepo and J A Robinson (2014). “Democracy does cause growth,” NBER Working Paper No. 20004.

Barro, R J. (1991). “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.106 No.2 pp.407-443.

Barro, R.J. (1996). “Democracy and Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth 1, 1-27

Besley, T., and M. Kudamatsu (2008): “Making Autocracy Work,” in Institutions and Economic Performance, ed. By E. Helpman. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Carbone, G. (2012). “Do new democracies deliver social welfare? Political regimes and health policy in Ghana and Cameroon” Taylor & Francis Vol. 19, No. 2, 157–183.

Dewan, E. Dan Hussein S. (2001). Determinants of Economic Growth (Panel Data Approach). Working Paper 01/04. Economic Department Reserve Bank of Fiji.

Doucouliagos H and Ulubasoglu MA (2008). “Democracy and economic growth: A meta-analysis”. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 61–83.

Garcia dan Soelistianingsih (1998). Why Do Differences in Provincial Incomes Pesist in Indonesia?. Bulltein of Indonesian Economic Studies.

Gerring, J., P. Bond, W. Barndt, and C. Moreno (2005). “Democracy and growth: A historical perspective”. World Politics 57: 323–364

Gil, R., M. Casey, and X. SalaiMartin (2004): “Do democracies have different public policies than nondemocracies?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives.

Helliwell, J F (1994). “Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth”, NBER Working Paper No. 4066.

Islam, S. (1995): The human development index and per capita GDP, Applied Economics Letters, 2:5, 166-167.

Islam, N. (1995). Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. The Quarterly

Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 4, Nov , 1127-1170.

Knutsen CH (2011). “Which democracies prosper? Electoral rules, form of government and economic growth”. Electoral Studies 30(1): 83–90.

Knutsen CH (2012). “Democracy and Economic Growth: A Survey of Arguments and Results”. International Area Studies Review 15(4): 393-415.

Lucas, R.E (1988). On The Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetery Economics 22: 3-42

Martinez-Bravo, M., etc. 2012. “The effect of Democratization on Public Goods and Redistribution: Evidence From China”. NBER Working Paper Series No.18101.

McCulloch, N., dan Malesky, E. 2010. “Does Better Local Governance Improve District Growth Performance in Indonesia IDS Working Papers 369, Institute of Development Studies.

Milesi-Ferreti, G., M. Rostagno and Roberto Perotti. (2002). “Electoral Systems and Public Spending.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. May, 117:2, pp. 609–57

McArthur dan Mc Cord (2017). Fertilizing Growth: Agricultural Inputs adn their effect in economic development. Journal of Development Economics

Moricz, S., dan Sjoholm, F. (2014). The Effect of Election on Economic Growth: Results from a Natural Experiment in Indonesia. IFN Working Paper No 1023. Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

Papaioannou, E and G Siourounis (2008) “Democratisation and growth”, The Economic Journal 118: 1520-1551.

Pepinsky, T.C, dan Wihardja, M.M. (2009). Decentralization and Economic Performance in Indonesia. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Political Sicence Association. Chicago

Persson, Torsten, Guido Tabellini, (2004a) "Constitutions and Economic Policy", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18, No. 1, (Winter). pp. 75-98.

_____________________(2004b) "Constitutional Rules and Fiscal Policy Outcomes", American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 1, (March). pp. 25-45

Persson T and Tabellini G (2003). The Economic Effect of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Persson T and Tabellini G (2006). Democracy and development: The devil in the details. American EconomicReview 96(2): 319–324

Persson, T., dan Tabellini, G. (2007). The Growth Effect of Democracy: Is it Heterogeneous and How Can It Be Estimated? NBER Working Paper 13150.

Persson, T and G Tabellini (2009). “Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1: 88-126.

Przeworski, Adam dan Limongi, Fernando (1997). “ Modernization : Theories and Facts” , World Politics, 49, pp 155-183.

Rodrik, D and R Wacziarg (2005). “Do democratic transitions produce bad economic outcomes?”, American Economic Review, 95: 50-55.

Sirowy, L and A Inkeles (1990). “The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review”, Studies In Comparative International Development, 25: 126-157.

Sjahrir, B.S dan Kis-Katos, K. (2011). “Does local governments’ responsiveness increase with decentralization and democratization? Evidence from sub-national budget allocation in Indonesia”. University Of Freiburg, Germany.

Sjahrir, B.S., K. Kis-Katos and G.G. Schulze. (2013) 'Political Budget Cycles in Indonesia at the District Level' Economics Letters 120, 342–345

Skoufias E., etc. (2014). “Electoral Accountability and Local Goverment Spending in Indonesia”. Policy Research Working Paper, 6782. World Bank.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.