International Review of Humanities Studies
Abstract
This research explores gotong royong, an indigenous Indonesian concept of mutual cooperation, as an alternative political culture in the face of liberal individualism and capitalist competition. Drawing from the philosophical legacy of Soekarno, Indonesia’s founding president, the research situates gotong royong not merely as a traditional value, but as a dynamic political principle grounded in tolerance, solidarity, and social justice. Soekarno’s vision of democracy transcends procedural liberalism by emphasizing equal capabilities, not just equal opportunities, thereby addressing the structural and cultural barriers that hinder political participation for marginalized citizens. Through a comparative lens, the article juxtaposes the atomizing effects of liberalism—where personal rights become barriers to collective action—with gotong royong as a praxis of ethical responsibility and collective agency. It integrates Hannah Arendt’s distinction between labor, work, and action to highlight how gotong royong embodies a form of praxis that reveals the plurality and interdependence of human existence within public life. In this view, politics is not a battlefield of interests but a space for enacting shared values and sustaining communal well-being. The research also grounds its arguments in practical examples, notably the tanggung renteng cooperative model, a community-based economic system rooted in shared decision-making, risk-bearing, and responsibility. This system reflects the ethical dimensions of gotong royong, where mutual trust and empathy guide economic relations and prevent default through collective discipline. The model illustrates how economic participation can be democratized through cultural mechanisms rather than imposed market logic. Ultimately, the research contends that gotong royong is not a nostalgic relic but a forward-looking political imagination that revitalizes public life. It offers a philosophical and practical response to the erosion of social capital and the commodification of political space. As a living principle embedded in Indonesia’s constitutional ideals, gotong royong affirms that genuine political emancipation must be rooted in human solidarity and shared responsibility. The revitalization of this principle is essential for cultivating rational, empathetic, and initiative-taking citizens who act not out of self-interest, but for the collective good.
References
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition: A Study of the Central Dilemmas Facing Modern Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cunningham, Frank. 2002. Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge Feith, Herbert; Castle, Lance (ed.). 2007. Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-1965. Singapore: Equinox.
Putnam, Robert (ed.). 2002. Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yamin, Muhammad. 1959. Naskah Persiapan Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Jilid I. Jakarta: Yayasan Prapanca.
Yamin, Muhammad. 1959. Naskah Persiapan Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Jilid II. Jakarta: Yayasan Prapanca.
Yamin, Muhammad. 1959. Naskah Persiapan Undang Undang Dasar 1945 Jilid III. Jakarta: Yayasan Prapanca.
Yamin, Muhammad.1958. Proklamasi dan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.
Recommended Citation
Adian, Donny Gahral
(2026)
"GOTONG ROYONG AS POLITICAL PRAXIS: COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND DEMOCRATIC ACTION,"
International Review of Humanities Studies: Vol. 11:
No.
1, Article 21.
DOI: 10.7454/irhs.v11i1.1456
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/irhs/vol11/iss1/21
Included in
Anthropology Commons, Art and Design Commons, Creative Writing Commons, Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Education Law Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, History Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, Linguistics Commons, Museum Studies Commons, Philosophy Commons, Urban Studies and Planning Commons
