•  
  •  
 

International Review of Humanities Studies

International Review of Humanities Studies

Abstract

Addressing the difficulties of sustainable development, the Jakarta Industrial Estate Pulogadung encounters the challenge of becoming more inclusive in constructing infrastructure for walkers by creating paths that are friendly for pedestrians As walking serves as an important sustainable and healthful means of transport, having pedestrian pathways can enhance how the public views pedestrian accessibility in their workplace. This, in turn, can promote the use of more eco-friendly public transport options. This research aims to explore how the public views pedestrians in industrial zones, with the goal of promoting spaces that are friendly to walkers. The study utilized a quantitative method paired with a mixed-methods analysis, which comprised observations, interviews, surveys, and spatial assessments. The Walkability Index measured at JIEP was recorded as 62.46, which is categorized as "waiting for walking." This designation suggests that the JIEP Industrial Area holds significant potential for transformation into an area that supports pedestrians, particularly by incorporating green corridors and adequate facilities along roadways. The objective of this article is to highlight the significance of designing industrial areas to create a more comfortable and pedestrian-friendly atmosphere, informed by observations of pedestrian experiences.

Bahasa Abstract

Dalam tantangan pembangunan berkelanjutan, Jakarta Industrial Estate Pulogadung memiliki tantangan agar lebih inklusif dalam membangun infrastruktur bagi pejalan kaki melalui jalur pedestrian yang ramah bagi pejalan kaki karena berjalan kaki penting sebagai mode transportasi yang berkelanjutan dan sehat. Tersedianya jalur pedestrian dapat menjadi salah satu peningkatan persepsi masyarakat terhadap keramahan bagi pejalan kaki di lingkungannya bekerja sehingga menjadi penggerak penggunaan transportasi publik yang lebih ramah lingkungan. Penelitian ini mencoba melihat persepsi masyarakat terhadap pedestrian di kawasan industri sehingga memiliki ruang yang dimanfaatkan oleh pejalan kaki. Metode penelitiannya menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan metode campuran dalam menganalisanya termasuk melalui observasi, wawancara, kuesioner, dan analisis spasial. Indeks Kenyamanan Jalan Kaki (Walkability Index) yang diperoleh di JIEP sebesar 62,46, klasifikasinya adalah “menunggu berjalan kaki.” Klasifikasi ini menunjukkan bahwa Kawasan Industri JIEP memiliki potensi untuk dikembangkan menjadi lingkungan yang nyaman bagi pejalan kaki melalui penambahan koridor hijau dan fasilitas pendukung di sepanjang jalan. Tujuan artikel ini mencoba untuk memberikan pemahaman pentingnya disain kawasan industri untuk lingkungan yang nyaman dan lebih ramah bagi pejalan kaki melalui pengamatan pengalaman bagi pejalan kaki.

References

Ablitt, Jonathan. (2020). Walking In on People in Parks: Demonstrating The Orderliness of Interactional Discomfort in Urban Territorial Negotiations. Emotion, Space and Society, 34, 100648.

Adkins, A., Dill, J., Luhr, G., & Neal, M. (2012). Unpacking Walkability: Testing The Influence Of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2012.706365

Arar, M., & Kazaz, K. (2025). Assessing Urban Design Factors For Walkable Areas: Evidence From Dubai. Frontiers in Built Environment, 11, 1631826

Ariffin, R. N. R., Rahman, N. H. A., & Zahari, R. K. (2021). Systematic Literature Review Of Walkability And The Built Environment. Journal of Policy & Governance, 01(01), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33002/jpg010101.

Asiani, Y. (2007). “Pengaruh Kondisi Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) pada Iklim Mikro di Kota Bogor”. Depok. Universitas Indonesia.

Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). Urban Greening To Cool Towns And Cities: A Systematic Review of The Empirical Evidence. Landscape And Urban Planning, 97(3), 147-155.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2022). Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam angka 2022 (Nomor publikasi: 31000.2203; Nomor katalog: 1102001.31). Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

Chu, Y., Cui, J., Sun, J., & Guo, W. (2025). Research on Pedestrian Vitality Optimization in Creative Industrial Park Streets Based on Spatial Accessibility: A Case Study of Qingdao Textile Valley. Buildings, 15(10), 1679.

Coleman, A.F., Ryan, R.L., Eisenman, Theodore S., Locke, D. H., Harper, R. W. (2021). The influence of street trees on pedestrian perceptions of safety: Results from environmental justice areas of Massachusetts, U.S., Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Volume 64, 2021, 127258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127258

Cvejić, R., Eler, K., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., & Michael Strohbach. (2015). A Typology Of Urban Green Spaces , Ecosystem Services.

De Vos, J., Lättman, K., Van der Vlugt, A. L., Welsch, J., & Otsuka, N. (2023). Determinants And Effects of Perceived Walkability: a Literature Review, Conceptual Model and Research Agenda. Transport Reviews, 43(2), 303-324.

Estoque, R. C., Murayama, Y., & Myint, S. W. (2017). Effects of Landscape Composition and Pattern on Land Surface Temperature: An Urban Heat Island Study in The Megacities of Southeast Asia. Science of the Total Environment, 577, 349–359.

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2019). Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 1–25.

Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring The Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related To Walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65-84.

Fang, L., & Rao, F. (2024). When industry diversity meets walkability: An analysis of innovation in Baltimore, United States, and Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(2), 958-969.

Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American planning Association, 72(1), 75-87.

Guevara-Quinchúa, Y., & Francel-Delgado, A. E. (2023). Walk and connect. Measurement of inclusion criteria for people with functional diversity. Ibague, Colombia. Heliyon, 9(10).

Han, S. H. (2023). Industrial heritage, different social powers and public policy in East Asia: a comparison of typical cases in China and Japan. Creative Industries Journal, 1-18.

Hoehner, C. M., Barlow, C. E., Allen, P., & Schootman, M. (2012). Commuting distance, cardiorespiratory fitness, and metabolic risk. American journal of preventive medicine, 42(6), 571-578.

Ibrahim, F. I., Nadia, N. A., & Xingrui, C. (2023). Psychological effects of green spaces on walking accessibility. Planning Malaysia, 22(3-2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v22i32.1525

Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F., Smith, G., Conticelli, E., Tondelli, S., Ribeiro, P., Ramos, R. (2023). The pedestrian network concept: A systematic literature review. Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100051

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press.

Kim, H., & Ujang, N. (2019). Influence of Social Environment on Walking Behavior in Urban Neighborhoods. Sustainability, 11(12), 3351.

Kim, Y., Choi, B., Choi, M., Ahn, S., & Hwang, S. (2024). Enhancing pedestrian perceived safety through walking environment modification considering traffic and walking infrastructure. Frontiers in public health, 11, 1326468.

Leather, James, Herbert Fabian, Sudhir Gota, Alvin Mejia. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities State and Issues.

Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). The 3Ds+ R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 11(3), 204-215.

Litman, T. (2021). Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Lo, R. S. H. (2011). Walkability planning in Jakarta [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong]. eScholarship Repository, University of California Transportation Center. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/05p5r596

Macmillan, A., et al. (2014). The societal costs and benefits of commuter bicycling: simulating the effects of specific policies using system dynamics modeling.Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(4), 335-344. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307250

Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282-296.

Müller, C., Paulsen, L., Bucksch, J., & Wallmann-Sperlich, B. (2024). Built and natural environment correlates of physical activity of adults living in rural areas: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21(1), 52.

Mulyadi, A. M., Sihombing, A. V. R., Hendrawan, H., Vitriana, A., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Walkability and importance assessment of pedestrian facilities on central business district in capital city of Indonesia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 16, Article 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100695

Nielsen, A.B., van den Bosch, M., Maruthaveeran, S. et al. (2014). Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17, 305–327 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1

Pauleit, S.; Duhme, F. Assessing The Environmental Performance of Landcover Types for Urban Planning. Landscape Urban Planning. 2000, 52, 1–20.

Pereira, M. F., Vale, D. S., & Santana, P. (2023). Is walkability equitably distributed across socio-economic groups?–A spatial analysis for Lisbon metropolitan area. Journal of transport geography, 106, 103491

Ramadhan, Muhammad W.R., Anggraini, S.P., dan Nurulhuda, A. M. (2024). Ruang Pejalan Kaki: Memahami Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Aktivitas Berjalan Kaki Di Kawasan Komersial: Studi Kasus Jl. Pangeran Mangkubumi. Seminar Karya & Pameran Arsitektur Indonesia 2024. Artificial Inteliigence in the City. 2964-8483 Vol 7, No. 1, Juli 2024.

Ramesh, B., BhanuMurthy, I., & Pai, S. (2016). Industrial estates programme in Goa: An evaluation.

Rizki, A. R., Tumuyu, Setiawati, Sri., Rushayati, S.B. (2024). The Impact of Urban Green Space on The Urban Heat Island Phenomenon – A Study Case in East Jakarta, Indonesia. Geoplanning. 2024 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 31-42.

Sakamoto, S., Kogure, M., Hanibuchi, T., Nakaya, N., Hozawa, A., & Nakaya, T. (2023). Effects of Greenery At Different Heights in Neighbourhood Streetscapes on Leisure Walking: a Cross-Sectional Study Using Machine Learning of Streetscape Images in Sendai City, Japan. International Journal of Health Geographics, 22(1), 29.

Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., et. al. (2022). Physical Activity, Built Environment, and Health: Progress and Future Directions. The Lancet, 400(10362), 1629–1642.

Shashua-Bar, L., & Hoffman, M. E. (2000). Vegetation As a Climatic Component in The Design of An Urban Street: An Empirical Model For Predicting The Cooling Effect of Urban Green Areas With Trees. Energy And Buildings, 31(3), 221-235.

Smith, M., Hosking, J., Woodward, A., Witten, K., MacMillan, A., Field, A., & Mackie, H. (2017). Systematic Literature Review of Built Environment Effects on Physical Activity And Active Transport–An Update And New Findings on Health Equity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition And Physical Activity, 14(1), 158.

Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Design, 10(1), 47–64.

Sreetheran, M., & Van Den Bosch, C. C. K. (2014). A Socio-Ecological Exploration of Fear of Crime in Urban Green Spaces–A Systematic Review. Urban For Urban Green. 13 (1), 1–18.

Trolese, Marco; De Fabiis, Francesco; Coppola, Pierluigi. (2023). A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station. Sustainability; Basel Vol. 15, Iss. 21,  (2023): 15389. DOI:10.3390/su152115389

Woodcock, J., et al. (2009). Public Health Benefits of Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse-Gas Emissions: Urban Land Transport. The Lancet, 374(9705), 1930-1943. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1

Wu, J., Wang, M., Li, W., Peng, J., & Huang, L. (2015). Impact of Urban Green Space on Residential Housing Prices: Case Study in Shenzhen. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(4), 05014023.

Yang, J., McBride, J., Zhou, J., & Sun, Z. (2005). The Urban Forest in Beijing And Its Role In Air Pollution Reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 3 (2), 65-78.

Zhao, G., Cao, M., & De Vos, J. (2024). Exploring Walking Behaviour and Perceived Walkability of Older Adults in London. Journal of Transport & Health, 37, 101832.

Download

Share

COinS