Abstract
Due to gobalization, world trade has increased tremendously. Franchising having surged as one of the many business models has the potential to improve the economy of the community. Basically, franchising refers to a method of goods and services distribution to consumers. The party who owns the method is referred to as the franchisor, while the party given the right to use a method the franchisee. This article examines the legal issues that arise in granting license rights from foreign franchisors to franchisees, and how the laws in Indonesia provide protection for the rights and obligations of the parties. The research employed the normative juridical method or library research. Normative legal research examines the law as a positive norm as it is written in the book. In accordance with Article 1320 and 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code, arrangements of franchising agreement in Indonesia are based on the agreement between the parties. To provide legal protection for recipients foreign franchise in Indonesia, the government has enacted the Government Regulation No. 42/2007 on Franchise and Trade Minister Regulation No. 53/2007 on the Implementation of Franchising. In principle, the settlement of the problems that occur in international franchising agreement would be resolved by consultation or negotiation. If consensus is not reached, the parties can take the dispute to international arbitration. In general, the dispute over the franchise business concept is mostly resolved through the general justice institution.
Bahasa Abstract
Artikel ini membahas masalah hukum yang timbul dalam pemberian hak lisensi dari pemilik waralaba asing ke pemegang waralaba di Indonesia, serta bagaimana hukum di Indonesia memberikan perlindungan untuk hak dan kewajiban para pihak. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara normatif dengan mengkaji bahan-bahan hukum dan wawancara terfokus. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa pengaturan perjanjian waralaba di Indonesia didasarkan pada perjanjian di antara para pihak, sesuai dengan pasal 1320 dan pasal 1338 KUH Perdata. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 Tahun 2007 tentang Waralaba dan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 53 Tahun 2007 tentang Waralaba adalah dasar hukum yang dapat digunakan untuk mengatasi masalah yang timbul dari konsep bisnis ini. Dalam praktiknya, penyelesaian perselisihan dilakukan melalui musyawarah atau mediasi. Jika tidak ada kesepakatan tercapai, para pihak dapat membawa perselisihan ke lembaga arbitrase. Secara umum, sengketa konsep bisnis waralaba sebagian besar diselesaikan melalui lembaga peradilan umum.
References
Legal documents
Indonesia. The Government Regulation No. 42/2007 on Franchise. Republik Indonesia, 2007.
USDC. The United States Department of Commerce. United States of America, n.d.
Books
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. 10th ed. West Group, 2014.
Gautama, Sudargo. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1985.
Hardjowahono, Bayu Seto. Hukum Perdata Internasional. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1992.
Karamoy, Amir. Percaturan Waralaba Indonesia. Jakarta: Foresight Asia, 2013.
———. Sukses Usaha Lewat Waralaba. Jakarta: Grafika, 1996.
Mufidin, M. Basarah dan Faiz. Bisnis Franchise dan Aspek-Aspek Hukumnya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2008.
Soelistyo, Henry. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Konsepsi, Opini, dan Aktualisasi. Jakarta, 2014.
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2014.
Sunardi, Juajir. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Franchise dan Perusahaan Transnasional. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995.
Sutedi, Adrian. Hukum Waralaba. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008.
Wijaya, Gunawan. Lisensi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Articles
Congress, United. The Committee on Small Business. United States of America, 1990.
Elmore, Andrew. “Franchise Regulation for the Fissured Economy.” The George Washington Law Review 86, no. 4 (2018): 907–965.
Elsaman, Radwa S. “Franchising in the Middle East: The Example of Egypt.” Pacific Basin Law Journal Title 35, no. 1 (2017): 39–66.
Fathurahman, Muhamad Farhan, Anissa Windarti, and Iwan Purwanto’. “Pengaruh Value dan Physical Benefit Produk Waralaba Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen.” Journal of Applied Business and Economics 4, no. 4 (2018): 305–319.
Hanim, Lathifah. “Perlindungan Hukum HaKI dalam Perjanjian Waralaba di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum XXVI, no. 2 (2011): 571–589.
Hastuti, Indra. “Aspek Hukum Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise).” Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat (2006): 27–38.
Listyawati, Peni Rinda. “Perjanjian Franchise Sebagai Perjanjian Innomenaat dalam Pandangan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Hukum XVII, no. 2 (2006).
Malau, Masnur Tiurmaida. “Aspek Hukum Peraturan dan Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Menghadapi Liberalisasi Ekonomi Regional: Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015.” Rechts Vinding 3, no. 2 (2015): 163–182.
Mullin, Cheryl L, and Todd A Fisher. “Franchisee vs. Agent : The Relationship between Franchisors and Area Representatives.” Franchise Law Journal 36, no. 3 (2017): 491–504.
Ramırez-Hurtado, Jose M., Juan M. Berbel-Pineda, and Beatriz Palacios-Florencio. “Study of the Influence of Socio-Economic Factors in the International Expansion of Spanish Franchisors to Latin American Countries.” PLoS ONE 1, no. 1 (2018): 1–19.
Rusli, Tami. “Analisis Terhadap Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise) Usaha Toko Alfa Mart (Studi Pada PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya, Tbk).” Keadilan Progresif 6, no. 26 (2015): 2015.
Setiawan. “Segi-Segi Hukum Trade dan Licensing.” Varia Peradilan 7 (1991): 152.
Sherkow, Jacob S. “The CRISPR Patent Landscape: Past, Present, and Future.” The CRISPR Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 5–9.
Steinberg, By David L, Derek D Mcleod, and Emily M Mayer. “Anti Trust and Franchising Law: Uncertainty Abounds: The Joint Employer Doctrine and the Franchise Business Model Office.” Michigan Bar Journal, no. 5 (2017): 26–29.
Sudjana, U. “Pembangunan Hukum dalam Peningkatan Daya Saing Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di Indonesia Sebelum dan Pasca Kesepakatan Integrasi Ekonomi ASEAN.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (2015): 298–318.
Widodo, Selamat. “Karakteristik Yuridis Perjanjian Waralaba.” Jurnal Kosmik Hukum 16, no. 1 (2016): 64–73.
Wingrove, Christopher A, and Boris Urban. “Franchised Fast Food Brands : An Empirical Study of Factors Influencing Growth.” Independent Research Journal in the Management Sciences, no. 2413–1903 (2016): 1–8.
Yuswanto, Slamet. “Analisis Pengembangan Usaha Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual.” Lingkar Widyaiswara 4, no. 4 (2017): 8–24.
Zwisler, Carl E, John J Mcnutt, Frank J Sciremammano, Franchise Law Journal, Eric Karp, Ari Stern, and A Proposal. “A Proposed Mandatory Summary Franchise Disclosure Document : A Solution in Search of a Problem.” Franchise Law Journal 541, no. 35 (2016): 465–490.
Recommended Citation
Sugeng, Sugeng
(2019)
"LEGAL PROTECTION FOR RECIPIENTS OF FOREIGN FRANCHISE RIGHTS IN INDONESIA,"
Indonesia Law Review: Vol. 9:
No.
2, Article 1.
DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v9n2.530
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol9/iss2/1