•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The 21st century is the era of the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR). It is encouraged by the development of the company as a business and societal entities that balances public and private interests. If there is a balance of public and private interests in the company, the application of CSR should be able to accommodate the public interest. However there are a lot of companies in Indonesia that do not involve the community in the formulation of CSR implementation model. This resulted the implementation of CSR which is often not well targeted. In that context, the theory of corporate constitutionalism becomes a relevant theory to answer this problem. The theory of corporate constitutionalism puts deliberation as one of the principles to achieve the legitimacy of decision-making in the corporation. Through a process of deliberation formulation of CSR model with the community, not just the interests of shareholders that can be accommodated but also the interests of stakeholders. Thus, CSR can actually be an instrument solvingto solve the global and local challenges.

Bahasa Abstract

Abad ke-21 adalah era perkembangan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan atau yang dalam bahasa Inggris disebut Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Hal ini didorong oleh perkembangan perusahaan sebagai entitas bisnis dan sosial yang menyeimbangkan kepentingan publik dan swasta. Jika ada keseimbangan kepentingan publik dan swasta di perusahaan, penerapan CSR harus mampu mengakomodasi kepentingan publik. Namun ada sejumlah besar perusahaan di Indonesia yang tidak melibatkan masyarakat dalam perumusan model implementasi CSR. Hal ini mengakibatkan pelaksanaan CSR sering kali menjadi tidak tepat sasaran. Dalam konteks tersebut, teori konstitusionalisme perusahaan menjadi teori yang relevan untuk menjawab masalah ini. Teori konstitusionalisme perusahaan menempatkan musyawarah sebagai salah satu prinsip untuk mencapai legitimasi pengambilan keputusan dalam perusahaan. Melalui proses perumusan musyawarah model CSR dengan masyarakat, bukan hanya kepentingan pemegang saham yang dapat ditampung tetapi juga kepentingan stakeholders. Dengan demikian, CSR sebenarnya dapat berperan dalam menjawab tantangan global dan lokal.

References

Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia. “Decision Number 53/PUU-VI/2008.” Governor of East Java. Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur tentang Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan (East Java Governor Regulation regarding Implementation of East Java Provincial Regulation regarding Corporate Social Responsibility). Pergub Jawa Timur No. 52 Tahun 2012 (East Java Governor Regulation No. 52 Year 2012). Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (Law regarding the Enactment of Laws and Regulations). UU No. 12 Tahun 2011, LN No. 82 Tahun 2011 (Law No. 12 Year 2011, SG No. 82 Year 2011). Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas (Government Regulation regarding Environmental and Social Responsibility of Limited Liability Company). PP No. 47 Tahun 2012, LN No. 89 Tahun 2012 (Government Regulation No. 47 Year 2012, SG No. 89 Year 2012). Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Penanaman Modal (Law regarding Investment). UU No. 25 Tahun 2007, LN No. 67 Year 2007 (Law Number 25 Year 2007, SG No. 67 Year 2007). Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Law regarding Limited Liability Company). UU No. 40 Tahun 2007, LN No. 106 Tahun 2007 (Law Number 106 Year 2007, SG No. 106 Year 2007). Province of East Java. Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur tentang Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan (East Java Provincial Regulation regarding Corporate Social Responsibility). Perda Jawa Timur No. 4 Tahun 2011, LD No. 4 Tahun 2011 Seri D (East Java Provincial Regulation No. 4 Year 2011, PG No. 4 Year 2011 D Series).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010. Bottomley, Stephen. The Constitutional Corporation: Rethinking Corporate Governance. Hampshire and Burlington: Ashgate, 2007. Dine, Janet. The Governance of Corporate Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Habermas, Jurgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Oxford: Polity Press, 1996. Hirschland, Matthew J. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Shaping of Global Public Policy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006. Pohle, George and Jeff Hittner. Attaining Sustainable Growth through Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: IBM Global Service, 2008. Scherer, Andreas Georg and Guido Palazzo. “Introduction: Corporate Citizenship in a Globalized World” in Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship. Edited by Andreas Georg Scherer and Guido Palazzo. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2008. Sugiharto. Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Wilayah (Development and Regional Development). Medan: USU Press, 2006. Tim Penyusun Pedoman CSR Bidang Lingkungan. Pedoman CSR Bidang Lingkungan (CSR Guidelines on Environment). Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2008. Ward, Halina. “Corporate Social Responsibility in Law and Policy” in Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility. Edited by Nina Boeger et.al. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2008.

Bhattacharya, C.B., Sankar Sen and Daniel Korschun. “Using Corporate Social Responsibility to Win the War for Talent.” MIT Sloan Management Review Vol. 49 No. 2 (Winter 2008): 37-44. Corbett, Angus and Peta Spender. “Corporate Constitutionalism”. Sydney Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1 (March 2009): 147-161. Suharto, Edi. “Corporate Social Responsibility: What is and Benefits for Corporate.” (Presented at Two-Day CSR Seminar: Strategy, Management and Leadership, Jakarta, 13-14 February 2013). .

Download

Share

COinS