•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Indonesia as a developing country is in the urgent need to improve its arbitration law and practice. One of the reasons is because Indonesia may gain many advantages by such improvement, such as: increase of its international reputation as a safe place to invest or conduct trading since there is an assurance that future disputes may be promptly solved through arbitration. One way to improve Indonesia arbitration practice is by creating the jurisdiction as a friendly place to arbitrate, which firstly shall be analysed by reviewing its drawbacks as a preferable seat of arbitration, specifically on the procedure to enforce arbitral awards and the respective judicial supports to conduct arbitration within the jurisdiction.

References

Books:

Huala, Adolf (2002), International Commercial Arbitration, Jakarta: Raja

Grafindo Persada.

Redfern H, Martin Hunter, Nigel Blackaby and Constantine Partasides (2004),

Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, London: Ox[1]ford University Press.

Articles:

BANI, ‘Arbitration Development in Indonesia’, (2007) 1 Oct-Dec Indonesia Ar[1]bitration Quarterly Newsletter 4.

Casey B J, ‘The Place of Arbitration’ (Toronto Arbitration Breakfast Meeting

Seminar Note), http://www.arbitrationroundtable.com/casey/casey[1]article.pdf, (accessed 14 July 2009).

Luttrell S R, ‘Lex Arbitri Indonesia: the law, practice and place of commercial

arbitration in Indonesia today’ (2007) 10(6) Int. A.L.R.

Mills K, ‘Enforcement of Arbitral Award in Indonesia & Other Issues of Ju[1]dicial Involvement in Arbitration’ (the up-dated version of paper that

was being presented at the Inaugural International Conference of Ar[1]bitration of the Malaysia Branch of the Chartered Institute in Kuala

Lumpur) 1/3 2003) http://www.arbitralwomen.org/files/publica[1]tion/4310102632224.pdf (accessed 19 July 2009).

Park W W, ‘Lex Loci Arbitry and International Commercial Arbitration’ (1983)

32 ICLQ.

Schaefer J K, ‘Leaving the Colonial Arbitration Laws Behind: South East Asia’s

Move into the International Arbitration Arena’ (2000) 16 (3) Arb. Int’l

297-332.

Thirgood R (2004), ‘International Arbitration: The Justice Business’, 21 (4)

J.Int’l Arb.

Cases:

Ascom Electro AG v P.I Manggala Mandiri Sentosa W.7DC.Ht.02/Pdt.Eks/Abt.

Int/1993.03 (22 September 1993).

PT Krakatau Steel v International Piping Product Inc 282/Pdt/2002/PN.Jak.

Sel.

PT Perusahaan Dagang Tempo v PT Roche Indonesia 454/Pdt.G/1999/PN Jak.

Sel (30 May 200)

Download

Share

COinS