Abstract
A new property right known as the coastal waters commercial use right (Hak Pengusahaan Pengairan Pesisir (HP-3)) introduced by Law No. 27 of 2007 regarding the Management of Coastal and Small Island Areas has been ruled inoperative by the Constitutional Court. The decision raises a question as to whether the door has been closed to marketbased instruments that rely on property rights as a policy tool in natural resources management. This concern is relevant as legal developments in natural resources law internationally have moved away from traditional forms of regulation to focus on the creation of new statutory property rights such as fisheries rights, water use rights and rights associated with carbon sequestration. An exploration of theConstitutional Court’s decisionsuggests that a similar line of reasoning would not, and should not,arise in relation to other forms of property rights that the Government of Indonesia may seek to introduce in the future.
References
Books
Anderson, Terry and Leal, Donald. (2001). Free Market Environmentalism, New
York: Palgrave
Atmosudirdjo, Prajudi S.(1983). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Ghalia
Indonesia
Easter, William K, Rosegrant, Mark W and Dina, Ariel.(1998). Markets for Water:
Potential and Performance, USA and The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
Publishers
Echols, J M and Shadily, H. (1997). Kamus Indonesia Inggris 3rdedn, Jakarta:
Penerbit PT Gramedia
Fisher, Douglas. (2003). Australian Environmental Law, Sydney: Lawbook Co.
Gunningham Neil and Grabosky, Paul. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing
Environmental Policy, USA: Oxford University Press
Koesnadi,Hardjasoemantri.(1999).Hukum Tata Lingkungan,7thedn,Yogyakarta:
GadjahMada University Press
Ostrom, Elinor. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for
Collective Action, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press
Pudyatmoko, Sri Y. (2009). Perizinan: Problem dan Upaya Pembenahan, Jakarta:
Grasindo.
Seidman, Anne, Seidman, Robert and Abeyesekere, Nalin. (2001). Legislative
drafting for democratic change: a manual for drafters, London: Kluwer
Law International
Chapters in Books
Grey, Thomas C. (1980). ‘The Disintegration of Property’ in Property: NoMos
XXII69, Ed. by Pennock J. Roland and Chapman John W., New York: New
York University Press p. 69-85.
Stavins, Robert N. (2003). Experience with market-based environmental policy
instruments in Handbook of Environmental Economics – Environmental
Degr Adation and Institutional Responses Vol 1. Ed. by Mäler, Karl-Göran
and Vincent, Jeffrey R. North Holland: Elsevier p. 355–435.
Legal Documents
Law Number 27 Year 2007 regarding Coastal and Small Islands Management
(Undang-undang No. 27 Tahun 2007 tentang Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir
dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil)
Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 3/PUU•VIII/2010
High Court of Australia: ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 240
CLR 140; 261 ALR 653; [2009] HCA 51.
Official Journal of the European Communities, 6 June 2002, Recommendation
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2002 concerning
the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Europe
(2002/413/EC) L 148/24 EN, viewed 9 February 2013, http://eur-lex.
europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:148:0024:0027:
EN:PDF.
Articles
Aburto, J, Gallardo, G, Stotz, W, Cerda, C, Mondaca-Schachermayer, C and Vera, K
(2013). Territorial User Rights for Artisanal Fisheries in Chile – Intended
and Unintended Outcomes, 71 Ocean and Coastal Management, 284
Agbayani, R, Baticados, D and Siar, S (2000). Community Fishery Resources
Management on Malalison Island, Philippines: R and D Framework,
Interventions, and Policy Implications 28 Coastal Management, 19
Agnello, R and Donnelley, L (1975).Property Rights and Efficiency in the Oyster
Industry, 18 Journal of Law and Economics, 521
Arnold, C (2002). The Reconstitution of Property: Property as a Web of Interests,
26 Harvard Environmental Law Review, 281
Butt, S and Lindsey, T (2008).Economic Reform When the Constitution Matters:
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and Article 33, 44(2) Bulletin of
Indonesian Economic Studies, 239
Chen, C-L (2012). Unfinished Business: Taiwan’s Experience with Rights-Based
Coastal Fisheries Management, 36 Marine Policy, 955
Cox, S J B (1985). No Tragedy on the Commons, 7 Environmental Ethics, 49
Ellickson, R (1993). Property in Land, 102 Yale Law Journal, 1315
Hannesson, R (2013). Norway’s Experience with ITQs, 37 Marine Policy, 264
Hardin, G (1968). The Tragedy of the Common, 162 Science, 1243
Hentrich, S and Salomon, M (2006). Flexible Management of Fishing Rights and
a Sustainable Fisheries Industry in Europe, 30 Marine Policy, 712
Hepburn, S (2009). Carbon Rights as New Property: The Benefits of Statutory
Verification, 31 Sydney Law Review, 239
Hepburn, S (2010). Statutory Verification of Water Rights: The ‘Insuperable’
Difficulties of Propertising Water Entitlements, 19 Australian Property
Law Journal, 1
Hohfeld, W N (1911).Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions As Applied In
Judicial Reasoning, 23 Yale Law Journal, 16
Hohfeld, W N (1917).Fundamental Legal Conceptions As Applied In Judicial
Reasoning, 26 Yale Law Journal, 710
Holling, C S and Meffe, G K (1996).Command and Control and the Pathology of
Natural Resource Management 10(2) Conservation Biology, 328
Klinger, T (2004). International ICZM: In Search of Successful Outcomes, 47(3)
Ocean and Coastal Management195
Laerhove, F V and Berge, E (2011). Editorial: The 20th anniversary of Elinor
Ostrom’s Governing the Commons, 5(1) International Journal of the
Commons, 1
Levmore, S (2003). Property’s Uneasy Path and Expanding Future, 70 University
of Chicago Law Review, 181
McKenzie, N (2009). Water Rights in NSW: Properly Property? 31(3) Sydney Law
Review, 443
Nyce, O (2008). Water markets under the Resource Management Act 1991: Do
They Hold Water, 14 Canterbury Law Review, 23
Rose, C (1986). The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce and Inherent
Public Property, 53 University of Chicago Law Review, 711
Rosegrant, M (1994). Markets in Tradable Water Rights: Potential for Efficiency
Gains in Developing Country Water Resource Allocation, 22(11) World
Development, 1613
Schlager, E and Ostrom, E (1992). Property Rights Regimes and Natural
Resources: A Conceptual Analysis, 68(3) Land Economics, 231
Sinden, A (2007). The Tragedy of the Commons and the Myth of the Private
Property Solution, 78 University of Colorado Law Review, 533
Swaney, J (1992). Market Versus Command and Control Environmental Policies,
26(2) Journal of Economic Issues, 623
Thompson, B (2000). Tragically Difficult: The Obstacles to Governing the
Commons, 30 Environmental Law, 241
Waddell, S (2006). Chasing Rhe Elusive ‘Legal Rule’ in Indonesian Environmental
Law, 9(4) Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 331
Wyman, K M (2008). The Property Rights Challenge in Marine Fisheries 50
Arizona Law Review, 511
Yagi, N, Clark, M, Anderson, L, Arnason, R and Metzner R,(2012). Applicability of
IndividualTransferableQuotas (ITQs)in Japanese fisheries:AComparison
of Rights-Based Fisheries Management in Iceland, Japan, and United
States, 36 Marine Policy, 241
Websites
Amri, A 2008, ‘Land Property Rights and Coastal Resource Management: A
Perspective of Community Based Mangrove Conservation in Indonesia’,
Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Global Conference of the International
Association for the Study of the Commons, University of Gloucestershire,
Cheltenham, England, viewed 4 January 2013,
ac.uk/conference%20papers/papers/A/Amri_201101.pdf>
Center for International Environment Law (CIEL), Association for Community
andEcologically-BasedLawReform(HuMa Perkumpulan untuk Pembaruan
Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis), Institute for Policy Research
and Advocacy (Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM)),
IndonesianCenter forEnvironmentalLaw(ICEL), andInternationalCentre
for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) 2002, ‘Whose resources?whose
common good? Towards a new paradigm of environmental justice and the
national interest in Indonesia’, viewed 9 February 2013,
ciel.org/Publications/Whose_Resources_3-27-02.pdf>
Clark,JR1992, ‘Integratedmanagementof coastal zones’,FAOFisheriesTechnical
Paper No. 327, FAO, Rome, viewed 12 December 2012,
observatoriodellitoral.es/subido/_documentos/ordenacion_del_litoral/
doctrina/integrated_management_of_coastal_zones.pdf>
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) 2003, Virtual
Conference Integrating Environmental Considerations into Economic Policy
Making Processes ‘Command and Control Instruments’ viewed21December
2012,
Fisheries and Aquaculture Department FAO Corporate Document, (n.d.)
‘Territorial use rights in marine fisheries: definitions and conditions -
distinctions between common property and territorial use rights’, Food
and Agriculture Organisation, viewed 4 January 2012,
org/docrep/003/T0507E/T0507E02.htm>
Gunningham,Nand Sinclair,D(n.d.), ‘Designing Smart Regulation’,OECD, viewed
29 December 2012,
emergingandtransitioneconomies/33947759.pdf>
HukumOnline, 2007, ‘The Metamorphosis of the Legal Entity in Indonesia’
(Metamorfosis Badan Hukum Indonesia),
viewed 29 December 2012, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/
hol17818/metamorfosis-badan-hukum-indonesia>
Shotton, R (ed.) 2000, ‘Use of Property Rights in Fisheries Management’, FAO
Fisheries Technical Paper 404/2, Food andAgricultureOrganisation,Rome,
viewed 4 January 2013,
x8985e05.htm>
Whitten, S, Carter, M and Stoneham, G 2004, (eds.) ‘Market-based tools for
environmental management’, Proceedings of the 6th annual AARES
national symposium’ - a report for the RIRDC/Land and Water Australia/
FWPRDC/MDBC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program, viewed 21 December
2012,
Other
Djais, Ferrianto H, PutraSapta, RaharjoSigit Pand Widianto,Arief (n.d.) ‘Coastal
Water Commercial Use Right – an instrument for the use of coastal and
small island resources’ (Hak Pengusahaan Perairan Pesisir -sebuah
instrumen pemanfaatan sumberdaya pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil), in
possession of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta.
Djais, Ferrianto H, PutraSapta, RaharjoSigit Pand Widianto,Arief 2008, ‘The
Coastal Waters Commercial Use Right as an instrument for use of coastal
and small island resources’ (Hak Pengusahaan Perairan Pesisir (HP-3)
sebagai instrumen pemanfaatan sumberdaya pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil),
Proceedings of National Conference on Coastal and Marine Management,
Manado, 27 August 2008, in possession of the Ministry of Marine Affairs
and Fisheries, Jakarta
Recommended Citation
Waddell, Sarah
(2012)
"PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA: HAVE THEY BEEN RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL?,"
Indonesia Law Review: Vol. 2:
No.
2, Article 4.
DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v2n2.17
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol2/iss2/4