•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Does the law merely contain rules? Or does it also include morality? The debate between H.L.A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin revolved around this very issue. Hart considered the law is nothing more than a set of rules whereas Dworkin believed that the law contains not only the rules but also principles which are morality and justice. This paper is trying to explore the issue of the relationship of law and morality in the context of this debate between Hart and Dworkin. The debate itself is very significant in the study of law. Following their arguments we can learn a lot about how the law should be understood and practiced. By listening to their whole debate we will also know that Hart’s positivistic thought and Dworkin’s tendency towards the natural law are not mutually negating. Hart Positivism is not anti-morality. It is precisely through positivism which he defended Hart aims at safeguarding the law by morality; whereas Dworkin has shown what had previously forgotten by the legal positivistic way of thinking, that is moral principles are integral parts of the law.

References

Books

A. Posner, Richard. (1995). Overcoming Law. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

Bodenheimer, Edgar. (1974). Jurisprudence: The Philosophy and Methode of Law.

Cambridge.

Bayles, Michael D. (1992). Hart’s Legal Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Publishers.

Coleman, Jules, ed.(2001). Hart’s Postcript: Essays on the Postcript of the Concept

of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald, ed. (1977). The Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

______________, (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

______________, (1985). A Matter of Principle. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

______________, (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gavison, R., ed., (1987). Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence

of H.L.A Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Greenawalt, Kent. (1987). Conflicts of Law and Morality, Oxford: Clarendon

Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Year 2 Vol. 1, January - April 2012 INDONESIA Law Review

______________ and Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in The Law. Oxford: Clarendon

Press.

______________, (1994). The Concept of Law. The Clarendon Press: Oxford.

______________, (2009). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of

Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kelsen, Hans. (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Simmons, A. John. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton,

NJ.: Princeton University Press.

Tebbit, Mark. (2005). Philosophy of Law: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Articles

Banakar, Reza. Review: “A life of H. L. A. Hart: The Nightmare of the Noble Dream,”

by Nicola Lacey. Nordic Journal of Law and Practice, 2006. Available at

http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk, accessed on 23 April 2010.

Hart, H. L. A., (1967). “Legal Positivisme.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed.

by Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press.

______________, (1968). “Duty.” In International Ecyclopedia of the Social Sciences,

ed. by David L. Sills. New York: Macmillan Co. and Free Press.

______________, “Interviewed: H. L. A. Hart in Conversation with David Sugarman”.

Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Jun., 2005).

______________,“The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights”. In Journal Proceedings

of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 49 (1948-1949), pp. 171-194.

From http//www.jstor.org, accessed on 25/11/2010

Shapiro, Scott J., “The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed”.

University of Michigan Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working

Paper Series, No.77 (March 2007). From SSRN: http://ssrn.com/

abstract=968657, accessed 25/11/2010

Download

Share

COinS