•  
  •  
 

Abstract

If any of Indonesia’s judiciary branches can be said to have been in constant flux before and after the one roof system under the Supreme Court, it is the Administrative Court. From limited jurisdiction—by limitation from The Administrative Court Act (ACA), (Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) and others unresponsive legal policy, establishment of new court, and supreme court decision—to expansion jurisdiction by enactment of Government Administration Act (GAA), (Undang-Undang Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan) and establishment sectoral laws, including expansion from Constitutional Court decision, has brought dynamic changing to the Administrative Court jurisdiction. In this paper, I will discuss to what extent the Administrative Courts have indeed changed, survived, and improved the administration of justice in their field. I will first provide a short overview of the original jurisdiction on the Administrative Court Act (ACA), followed by an analysis of the legal impact of the enactment of the Government Administration Act (GAA) and other relevant Law and Regulation. This paper demonstrated that Administrative Court jurisdiction expansion urgently required harmonization between the ACA and the GAA: the existing legal gap has been not sufficiently filled by the Supreme Court Regulation (SCR) or Supreme Court Circular (SCC).

Bahasa Abstract

Jika satu diantara cabang kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia yang terus berubah sebelum dan sesudah sistem satu atap di bawah Mahkamah Agung, itu adalah pengadilan administrasi. Dari kewenangan yang terbatas berdasarkan pembatasan dari Undang-Undang Peradilan Administrasi (Administrative Court Act: ACA), dan kebijakan hukum lain yang tidak responsif, pembentukan pengadilan baru, dan putusan Mahkamah Agung sampai mengalami perluasan kewenangan dengan diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintah (Government Administration Act), dan pembentukan hukum sektoral, termasuk perluasan dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, telah membawa perubahan dinamis bagi kewenangan (yurisdiksi) pengadilan administrasi. Dalam makalah ini, saya akan membahas sejauh mana pengadilan administrasi telah benarbenar berubah, bertahan dalam pasang surut kewenangan, dan peningkatkan administrasi peradilan di bidangnya. Ini pertama-tama akan memberikan gambaran singkat tentang kewenangan awal berdasarkan Undang-Undang Peradilan Administrasi (Administrative Court Act: ACA), diikuti dengan analisis dampak hukum dari berlakunya Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Government Administration Act: GAA) dan undang-undang serta peraturan terkait lainnya. Makalah ini menunjukkan bahwa perluasan yurisdiksi pengadilan administrasi mendesak membutuhkan harmonisasi antara ACA dan GAA: kesenjangan hukum yang ada tidak cukup diisi oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung dan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung.

References

Legal Document

Rumusan Hasil Diklat Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara dan Sengketa Aparatur Sipil Negara Pasca Berlakunya Perma Nomor 6 Tahun 2018, Denpasar, 8 s/d 12 Juli 2019

Indonesia, Law on Prohibiting Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, Law No. 5/1999, (SG of 1999 No. 33, Additional SG No. 3817)

----------, Law on Tax Courts, Law No. 14/2002 (SG of 2002 No. 27, Additional SG No. 4189).

----------, Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, Law No. 37/2004 (SG of 2004 No. 131, Additional SG No. 4443).

----------, the Law On Settlement of Industrial Disputes, Law No. 2/2004 (SG of 2004 No. 6, Additional SG No. 4356).

----------, Freedom of Information Act, Law No. 14/2008 (SG of 2008 No. 61, Additional SG No. 4846)

----------, Public Services Act, Law No. 25/2008 (SG Year 2009 No. 112, Additional SG No. 5038).

----------, Environmental Protection and Management Act, Law No. 32/2009 (SG No. 140 of 2009, Additional SG No. 5059).

----------, Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest Act, Law No. 2/2012 (SG No. 22/2012, Additional SG No. 5230)

----------, Second Amendment to Law No. 1 of 2015 concerning the Establishment of Government Regulations in lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents and Mayors Becoming Laws, Law No. 10/2016 (SG No. 130 of 2016, Additional SG No. 5898)

----------, General Elections Act, Law No. 7/2017 (SG Year 201 7 No. 182, Additional SG No. 6109)

----------, Land and Water Conservation Act, Law No. 37/2014 (SG of 2014 No. 299, Additional SG No. 5608)

----------, Trademarks and Geographical Indications Act, Law No. 20/2016 (SG Year 2016 No. 252, Additional SG No. 5953).

----------, Non-Tax State Revenue Act, Law No. 9/2018 (SG of 2018 No. 147, Additional SG No. 6245).

----------, SCR No. 2/2011 Regarding Procedures for Settling Disputes of Information Disclosure in Courts.

----------, SCR No. 4/2015 on Guidelines on the Proceedings In Testing Abuse of Power, (the SG of 2015 No. 1267).

----------, SCR No. 2/2016 Regarding Procedure Guidelines for Disputes on Designation of Development Locations for Public Interest in the Administrative Court (SG of 2016 No. 176)

----------, SCR No. 5/2017 Regarding Election Process Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Administrative Court, (SG of 2017 No. 1442)

----------, SCR No. 8/2017 Regarding Guidance for Obtaining a Verdict on the Receipt of an Application to Obtain a Decree and/or Act of a Government Agency or Officer, (Official Gazette of 2017 No. 1751).

----------, SCR No. 6/2018 Regarding Guidelines for Resolving Government Administrative Disputes After Taking Administrative Efforts, (SG of 2018 No. 1586).

------------, SCR No. 1/2019 Regarding the Administration of Court Cases and Proceedings by Electronic Means and its implementing regulation (SG of 2019 No. 894)

----------, SCR No. 2/2019 Regarding Guidelines for Dispute Resolution of Government Actions and Authority to Prosecute Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad), (SG of 2019 No. 940).

----------, SCR No. 3/2019 Regarding Procedures for Filing Objection Against the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (SG of 2019 No. 941)

Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) decision No. 77/PUU-IX/2011

MK decision No. 31/PUU-XI/2013

MK decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016

Supreme Court decision (SCD) No.150 K/TUN/1994, dated 7‐9‐1995 in juncture with No. 47 K/TUN/1997, dated 26‐01‐1998 in juncture with No. 245 K/TUN/1999, dated 30‐8‐2001.

SCD No. 22 K/TUN/1998, dated 37‐7‐2001 in juncture with 16 K/TUN/2000, dated 28‐2‐2001 in juncture with 93 K/TUN/1996, dated 24‐2‐1998.

SCD No. 252 K/TUN/2000 dated 13‐11‐2000.

SCD No. 302 K/TUN/1999, dated 8‐2‐2000 in juncture with No. 62 K/TUN/1998, dated 27‐7‐2001.

SCD No. 482 K/TUN/2003, dated 18‐8‐2004.

SCD No. 48 PK/TUN/2002, dated 11‐6‐2004.

SCR No. 4/2016 About Enabling Formulation Room Plenary Meeting Results 2016 As the Supreme Court Task Guidelines For Court

SCR No. 2/2019 About Enabling Formulation Room Plenary Meeting Results 2019 As the Supreme Court Task Guidelines For Court

Books

Asshiddiqie, Jimly et al. Putusan Monumental Menjawab Problematika Ketatanegaraan, (Malang: Setara Press & Forum Kajian Yurisprudensi, 2016).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Jakarta: Konpress, 2005).

Assegaf, Rifqi S. “The Supreme Court, Reformasi, Independence and the Failure to Ensure Legal Certainty”, Melissa Crouch (ed), The Politics of Court Reform, Judicial Change and Legal Culture in Indonesia, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Auby, Jean-Bernard & Lucie Cluzel-Metayer and Lamprini Xenou, “Administrative Law in France”, in René Seerden, Comprative Administrative Law, Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and United States (Cambridge: Intersentia Ltd, 2018)

Braconnier, Stéphane. “Introduction: A quick approach to French administrative law”, in Jean-Bernard Auby (ed), Collection Administrative Law, Droit Administratif (Rue des minimes: Bruylant, 2014)

Beckett, Julia. Public Management and the Rule of Law (New York: Routledge, 2010)

Bedner, Adriaan Willem. Administrative Courts In Indonesia, A Socio-Legal Study, (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001).

Bedner, Adriaan & Herlambang Perdana Wiratman. “The Administrative Courts: The Quest for Consistency” in Melissa Crouch (ed), The Politics of Court Reform, Judicial Change and Legal Culture in Indonesia, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)

Bedner, Adriaan. “‘Shopping forums: Indonesia’s Administrative Courts’, in A. Harding & P. Nicholson (eds.). New Courts in Asia, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)

Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law (London: Penguin Books, 2011)

Bhakti, Teguh Satya. Pembangunan Hukum Adminstrasi Negara Melalui Pemberdayaan Yurisprudensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Bandung: Alumni, 2018).

Brown, L. Neville & John S Bell. French Administrative Law, Fifth Edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)

Butt, Simon & Tim Lindsey. Indonesian Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)

Dekker, J. & Th. Drupsteen, “Legal Protection Against Decisions of Public Authorities In The Netherlands”, in Yong Zhang (ed), Comparative Studies on the Judicial Review System in East and Southest Asia (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997)

Dicey, A.V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Liberty Fund, reprint, originally published: 8th ed, Macmillan, 1915)

Dipopramono, Abdulhamid. Keterbukaan dan Sengketa Informasi Publik, Panduan Lengkap Memahami Open Government dan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik serta Praktik Sengketa Informasi Publik, (Jakarta: Renebook, 2017)

Erliyana, Anna. Keputusan Presiden: Analisis Keppres RI 1987—1998, (Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005).

Fenwick, Stewart. “Administrative Law and Judicial Review in Indonesia: the Search for Accoutability”, in Tom Ginsburg and Albert H.Y. Chen, Administrative Law and Governance In Asia, Comparative perspectives, (New York: Routledge law in Asia Series, 2009)

Fuke, Toshiro. Historical phases of State Liability as Law of Remedies-Some Introductory Remarks, dalam Yong Zhang (ed), Comperative Studies on Governmental Liability in East And Southeast Asia, Vol. 3, (The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1997).

Quinn, Bernard. “Indonesia: Patrimonial or Legal State? The Law on Administrative Justice of 1986 in Socio-Political Context”, in Timothy Lindsey (ed), Indonesia: Law and Society, (Sydney: The Federation Press, 1999)

Lev, Daniel S. “The state and law reform in Indonesia”, in Tim Lindsey (ed). Law Reform in Developing and Transitional States (New York: Routledge, 2007)

Linnan, David K. “Like a fish needs a bicycle Public law theory, civil society and governance reform in Indonesia”, in Tim Lindsey (ed). Law Reform in Developing and Transitional States (New York: Routledge, 2007)

Lotulung, Paulus Effendi. Mengkaji Kembali Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Pembentukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum Administrasi Negara (LPP-HAN), 2003).

Onnesorge, John K.M. Western Administrative Law in Northeast Asia: A Comparative’s History, thesis SJD degree (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002)

Ranchordás, Sofia and Boudewijn de Waard (Ed), The Judge and the Proportionate Use of Discretion, (New York: Routledge, 2016).

Rousset, Michel Rousset et Olivier. Droit Administrative II, Le contentieux administrative, Deuxième deition (Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 2004)

Manan, Bagir. Menjaga Kemerdekaan Pers di Pusaran Hukum, (Jakarta: Dewan Pers, 2010)

McConville, Mike and Wing Hong Chui, Research Methods for Law, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007)

Safri Nugraha, “Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Good Governance”, Pidato pada Upacara Pengukuhan Sebagai Guru Besar Tetap Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia”, Jakarta, 13 September 2016.

S.F. Marbun, Hukum Administrasi Negara I (Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2012).

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi dan Refleksi” (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018).

Siringo-ringo, R.O.B. et al, Buku Pintar Menjawab Permasalahan Teori dan Praktik Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, (Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, 2011).

Siahaan, Lintong Oloan Prospek PTUN Sebagai Pranata Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Di Indonesia, Studi Tentang Keberadaan PTUN Selama Satu Dasawarsa 1991-2001, (Jakarta: Perum Percetakan Negara RI, 2005)

Slamet, Kadar. Perluasan Wewenang Mengadili Peradilan Administrasi Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintahan. Ringkasan Disertasi Doktor, (Bandung: Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2013)

Susskind, Richard. Tomorrow’s Lawyers, An Introduction to Your Future, Second Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).

Download

Share

COinS