•  
  •  
 

Abstract

University has significant contribution to the development of nanotechnology. The role of university can be implemented through the TTLO, particularly in an effort to build a bridge for bottom-up nanotechnology for commercial purposes. There will be an increasingly significant link between the patent system and the university role in the development of nanotechnology.

References

Bibliography Aldous, William. et. al., The Law of Patent. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1982. Azagra-Caro, Joaquin M. Recognising the Value of Business Patents with the University Inventors, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, 2009. Al’Afghani, Mohammad Mova. Patent Classification for Nanotechnology, http://nanolaw.alafghani.info/2006/03/patent-classification-for.html Kenney, Martin. Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model, a paper downloaded from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733309001516 McKeough, Jill. et. al., Intellectual Property: Commentary and Materials, 4th ed., Lawbook C., 2007. Mergers, Robert Patrick. Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, Virginia: Michie, 1997. Richman, J. H., “University-Industry Collaboration: The United States Experience”, WIPO Conference Paper, June 23, 2005. Sampat, Bhaven N. et. al., Changes in University Patent Quality After the Bayh-Dole Act: A Re-examination, westlaw@westlaw.com. Wild, Joff. “Patent Challenges for Nanotech Investors”, Intellectual Asset Management, September/October 2003. Patenting Nanotechnology – an Overview of The Current Climate and Explanation of Classification 977. . Gold and Nanotechnology, . The Strassbourg Agreement Concerning The International Patent Classification 1971.

Download

Share

COinS