The Rio+20 Declaration on the “Future We Want”, is a political document that conveys the aspirations of the international community and provides a blueprint for a programmatic action to ensure sustainable development for the future. The six sections which the “Future we Want” focusses are: a shared common vision; renewing political commitment; green economy; institutional framework for strengthening sustainable development; framework for action; and means of implementation. For reasons of felicity the paper is divided into the following sections: (i) the general conceptual framework of sustainable development; (ii) Right to Development and eradication of poverty; (iii) Role of Green economy in guaranteeing sustainable development; (iv) Financial resources and transfer of technology; (v) Roadmap for the Future of sustainable development. The paper will endeavour to investigate the ‘sustainability of sustainable development paradigm’ based on two critical themes, namely: (a) whether the paradigm of ‘sustainable development’ that guarantees ecological security is under a serious threat, as was evident from the attitudes of developed countries at the Rio+20 Conference; and (b) possible solutions, based on the principles of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and equity which are imperative to sustain and further strengthen the existing international legal order by consolidation of principles of ‘solidarity’ and international cooperation among all countries, to be able to achieve sustainable development for preservation of planet Earth and future generations.
Books and articles Barnett, Jon. The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London, 2001 Bedjauoui, Mohammad. New International Economic Order. UNESCO, Paris, Brown Weiss, Edith. Intergenerational Equity. Entry, in 5 Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law 287-294, Rüdiger Wolfrum ed., Oxford, 2012 Churchill, R.R.and Lowe, Vaughan. The Law of the Sea. Manchester, 2009 Dato’ Seri Dr Mahathir bin Mohammad, speech at the official opening of the Second Ministerial Conference of Developing Countries on Environment and Development, Kuala Lumpur, on Monday, 27 April 1992 Desai, Bharat. Institutionalizing International Environmental Law. New York 2004 Drexhage, John and Murphy, Deborah. “Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012”, Background Paper. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting, 19 September 2010,United Nations Headquarters Friedman, Wolfgang. The Changing Structure of International Law. London, 1964 Guruswamy, L.D. Legal Control of Land-based Sea Pollution. London, 1982 Jenks, Wilfred. Common Law of Mankind, London, 1958 Koskeniemmi, M. Fragmentation of International Law, Final Report to UNGA, doc.A/RES/61/34, December 2006 Pardo, Arvid. “Ocean Space and Mankind”. Third World Quarterly, vol.6 (3), 1984, pp. 559-572 Rafalowicz Alex. “No agreement and deep division on ‘green economy”, Third World Network, 6 June 2012. Rajamani, L. ‘From Berlin to Bali and Beyond: Killing Kyoto Softly’ (2008) vol.57, International Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 909–939 Rajamani, Lavanya. The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime. 9 RECIEL 120 (2000) Sands, Philippe and Peel, Jacqueline. Principles of International Environmental Law. 1992 Shue, Henry. “Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions”. Law and Policy, vol.15, 1993 St. John, Ronald MacDonald, and Johnston, Douglas M. (eds), Towards World Constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community. Leiden, 2012 Speech titled “Man and Environment” was delivered at the Plenary Session of United Nations Conference on Human Environment Stockholm 14th June, 1972, www.unlibrary-nairobi.org/PDFs/Only_one_earth.pdf Economic Times, New Delhi, 4 June 2012 Economic Times, 21 June 2012 Documents International Law Reports (1957) Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution concerning the Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds or their Transboundary Fluxes 2001 UNTS 187 (1991) The Large Combustion Plant Directive, 88/609/EEC Trail Smelter Arbitration (USA v. Canada), United Nations Register on International Arbitral Awards (UNRIAA) vol.3, (1938/1941)
"SOME REFLECTIONS ON ‘THE FUTURE WE WANT’: IS THE’SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT’ PARADIGM AS A GUARANTOR OF ECOLOGICAL SECURITY UNDER SERIOUS THREAT?,"
Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 10
, Article 2.
Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol10/iss2/2