Abstract
The increasing number of sharia economic disputes as a result of sharia economic development causes alternative dispute resolution to be an option in resolving sharia disputes. Basyarnas and LAPS-OJK are sharia economic dispute resolution forums outside of litigation. From the results of the research, it is known that the National Basyarnas need to be strengthened against the implications of the unregistered Basyarnas in the LAPS-POJK list after the issuance of POJK No. 61 of 2020 jo. POJK No. 1 of 20014 concerning LAPS in the financial services sector. The mechanism for dispute resolution procedures at Basyarnas starts from the request for arbitration, the appointment of a single arbitrator or assembly arbitrator, the respondent's answer, reconciliation, witness or expert evidence, revocation of the application, decision, registration of the decision, and execution of the Basyarnas decision. Meanwhile, the dispute resolution mechanism at LAPS-OJK is carried out through a complaint process that does not reach an agreement and can be carried out through the courts or outside the court either through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution or through the facilitation of complaints by the OJK. The obstacle in sharia dispute resolution lies in regulations regarding alternative dispute resolution in the sharia financial services sector which have not been properly facilitated. Until now, the dispute resolution arrangements for sharia activities have only been regulated in the Sharia Banking Law and the Insurance Law.
Keywords: Arbitration, Basyarnas, Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions, Sharia Economic Disputes
Bahasa Abstract
Meningkatnya angka sengketa ekonomi syariah sebagai dampak dari perkembangan ekonomi syariah menyebabkan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa menjadi pilihan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa syariah. Basyarnas dan LAPS-OJK adalah forum penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di luar jalur litigasi. Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa basyarnas perlu dilakukan penguatan terhadap implikasi dari tidak terdaftarnya basyarnas dalam daftar LAPS-OJK pasca terbitnya POJK No. 61 Tahun 2020 jo. POJK No. 1 Tahun 20014 tentang LAPS di sektor jasa keuangan. Adapun mekanisme prosedur penyelesaian sengketa pada Basyarnas dimulai dari permohonan arbitrase, penunjukkan arbiter tunggal atau arbiter majelis, jawaban termohon, perdamaian, pembuktian saksi atau ahli, pencabutan permohonan, putusan, pendaftaran putusan, dan eksekusi putusan Basyarnas. Sedangkan mekanisme dalam penyelesaian sengketa pada LAPS-OJK dilakukan proses pengaduan tidak mencapai kata sepakat dan dapat dilakukan dengan melalui pengadilan maupun di luar pengadilan baik melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa maupun melalui fasilitasi pengaduan oleh OJK. Adapun hambatan dalam penyelesaian sengketa syariah terletak pada peraturan mengenai penyelesaian sengketa secara alternatif di sektor jasa keuangan syariah yang belum terfasilitasi dengan baik. Hingga saat ini pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa untuk kegiatan syariah baru diatur dalam UU Perbankan Syariah dan UU Perasuransian
Kata Kunci : Arbitrase, Basyarnas, Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.
References
Buku
Manan, Abdul. 2014. Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
OJK. 2019. Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Jakarta.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama
Indonesia, Undang-undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.
Indonesia, Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 61/POJK.07/2020 jo. POJK Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014 tentang LAPS di Sektor Jasa Keuangan
Indonesia, Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 1 Tahun 2013 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Artikel
Sari, Nilam. 2016. Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase. Banda Aceh: Yayasan PeNA. JURNAL
Hariyanto, Erie.2014. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia, Jurnal Iqtidha.vol 1
Nurhasanah dan Hotnidah Nasution. 2016. Kecenderungan Masyarakat Memilih Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Jurnal Ahkam, Vol. XVI, No. 2
Ro’fah Setyowati, Indah Purbasari, Encik Muhammad Fauzan. 2018. Consumers Spiritual Rights in the Islamic Banking Dispute Out of Court Settlement in Indonesia, Journal of Social Studies Education Research.
Ichsan, Nurul, 2015.Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Islam (Ahkam): Vo. XV, No. 2 Juli.
Internet
https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan- syariah/Default.aspx.
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5fe428dd7b98b/perlu-dukungan- publik-terhadap-beroperasinya-bank-syariah-indonesia/.
Recommended Citation
Sinayang, Baiq Inti Dhena
(2023)
"ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MELALUI BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL DAN LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM PROSPEK PERKEMBANGAN EKONOMI SYARIAH DI INDONESIA,"
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI: Vol. 2, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss3/5
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Bankruptcy Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Computer Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Construction Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Family Law Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Marketing Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Other Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Religion Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons, Taxation-Transnational Commons, Tax Law Commons, Torts Commons, Transnational Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, Workers' Compensation Law Commons