Abstract
The examination of the Abuse of Authority in the State Administrative Court is an administrative act or action that must be based on the existing laws and regulations. However, along with the growing understanding of the state of material law, the understanding that government based on laws has shifted to an understanding of state government based on law. The purpose of this paper is to see the extent of the authority of the State Administrative Court in examining territorial boundaries and the authorized procedures at the State Administrative Court. The research method is in the form of normative juridical research through library research. The results of the study to determine the procedure for testing the abuse of authority at the State Administrative Court (PTUN) are closely related to the results of supervision carried out by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) on decisions and/or actions of government officials. Decisions and/or actions of the Government as an authorized object in the Administrative Court are decisions and/or actions that contain administrative errors and cause state losses, and there is no criminal process as well as to know the PTUN authority in carrying out supervision. corruption law. In the enforcement of corruption, Government Officials, APIP, and Law Enforcement Apparatus (APH) must coordinate with each other in carrying out supervisory and law enforcement duties to government officials so that there is no "race" of cases.
Keywords: Abuse, Authority, Administrative Court
Bahasa Abstract
Pengujian Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara merupakan perbuatan atau tindakan administrasi harus didasarkan atas peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada. Namun seiring dengan berkembangnya pemahaman tentang negara hukum material, pemahaman bahwa pemerintahan berdasarkan pada undang-undang telah bergeser (shifting) menjadi pemahaman pemerintahan negara berdasarkan pada hukum. Tujuan dari penulisan ini untuk melihat sejauh mana kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam menguji tindakan penyalahgunaan jabatan serta prosedur menguji penyalahgunaan wewenang di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Metode Penelitian berbentuk penelitian yuridis normatif melalui studi kepustakaan . Hasil penelitian untuk mengetahui prosedur pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) berkaitan erat dengan hasil pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) terhadap keputusan dan/atau tindakan pejabat pemerintahan. Keputusan dan/atau tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebagai objek pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang di PTUN adalah keputusan dan/atau tindakan yang terdapat kesalahan administratif dan menyebabkan kerugian negara, serta belum ada proses proses pidana serta untuk mengetahui wewenang PTUN dalam pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang telah membawa implikasi dalam proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi. dalam penegakan tindak pidana korupsi, atasan Pejabat Pemerintahan, APIP, dan Aparat Penegak Hukum (APH) harus saling koordinasi dalam melakukan tugas pengawasan dan penegakan hukum kepada pejabat pemerintahan agar tidak terjadi “balapan” perkara.
Kata Kunci: Penyalahgunaan, Wewenang, PTUN
References
Buku
Adji, Indriyanto Seno. Korupsi, Kebijakan Aparatur Negara dan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Diadit Media, Tahun 2009, hlm. 35.
Hadjon, Philipus M. et.al., Hukum Administrasi dan Good Governance. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2012.
Marbun, S.F. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty, 2003.
Minarno, Nur Basuki. Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah yang Berimplikasi Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Surabaya: Laksbang Mediatama, 2011.
Permana dan Tri Cahya Indra. Catatan Kritis Terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Genta Press, 2016.
Artikel
Suparjoto, Slamet. “UU Administrasi Pemerintahan dan UU Peratun Berbanding Lurus,” Varia Peradilan, Vol. 35, No. 8 (2015), hlm. 48.
Tesis
Erliyana, Anna “Keputusan Presiden, Analisis Keppres RI 1987-1998.” Tesis Magister Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2005.
Internet
Abdullah, H. Ujang "Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia" diakses pada tanggal 18 November 2019
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Administrasi Negara, LN No. 292, TLN 5601 Tahun 2004, Pasal 1 ayat (2).
Recommended Citation
Simbolon, Bob Humisar
(2022)
"PENGUJIAN TINDAKAN PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG PEJABAT DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA,"
"Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI: Vol. 2, Article 26.
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/26
Included in
Administrative Law Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Bankruptcy Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Computer Law Commons, Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Construction Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Family Law Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law of the Sea Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Marketing Law Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Other Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Religion Law Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons, Taxation-Transnational Commons, Tax Law Commons, Torts Commons, Transnational Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, Workers' Compensation Law Commons