•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Business competition is one of the important factors in stimulating economic development in a country. As for business competition, it can encourage business actors to compete in conducting business innovations in order to get loyal consumers so that maximum profits can be achieved. One of the mechanisms for enforcing business competition law in Indonesia is the private enforcement method. In general, in Indonesia, law enforcement using the private enforcement method in orderly business competition has not been explicitly regulated in Law no. 5 of 1999. This can be seen from the compensation which is one of the elements of private enforcement which is only regulated by one article in Law no. 5 of 1999. In this provision, the KPPU only authorizes the determination of compensation. The formulation of the problem raised in this journal is how is the business competition law enforcement system in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition?, and what is the urgency of the private enforcement method that needs to be regulated in law enforcement of business competition in Indonesia? ?. The research was conducted using the juridical-normative method. This study concludes that in the enforcement of Law no. 5 of 1999 carried out by KPPU needs to be improved in eradicating and preventing violations of the Business Competition Law in Indonesia through the renewal of comprehensive legislation and procedures, and pro-competition laws and regulations in Indonesia, however, individual or group action against violators The Business Competition Law is still not being implemented efficiently because there is no regulation that clearly regulates it

Keywords: Business Competition, Law Enforcement, Private Enforcement, KPPU

Bahasa Abstract

Persaingan usaha merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam memberikan stimulasi perkembangan ekonomi pada suatu negara. Adapun persaingan usaha dapat mendorong para pelaku usaha untuk bersaing melakukan inovasi usaha demi mendapatkan konsumen yang loyal sehingga keuntungan yang maksimal dapat tercapai. Salah satu mekanisme penegakan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia adalah dengan metode private enforcement. Secara umum di Indonesia, penegakan hukum dengan metode private enforcement dalam tertib persaingan usaha belum diatur secara tegas pada UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Hal ini dapat terlihat dari ganti kerugian yang menjadi salah satu unsur private enforcement hanya diatur satu pasal pada UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Pada ketentuan tersebut yang hanya memberi kewenangan kepada KPPU dalam penetapan ganti kerugian. Rumusan masalah yang dikemukakan dalam jurnal ini adalah bagaimanakah sistem penegakan hukum persaingan usaha dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat?, dan apakah yang menjadi urgensi metode private enforcement perlu diatur dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia?. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode yuridis-normatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam penegakan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 yang dilakukan oleh KPPU perlu ditingkatkan dalam memberantas dan upaya pencegahan terhadap pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia melaui pembaharuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan prosedur yang komprehensif, dan aturan perundang-undangan pro persaingan di Indonesia, namun penindakan oleh perorangan atau kelompok terhadap pelanggar Undang-Undang Persaingan Usaha masih belum efisien terwujud diakarenakan belum terdapat regulasi yang mengaturnya secara jelas

Kata kunci : Persaingan Usaha, Penegakan Hukum, Private Enforcement, KPPU

References

Buku:

Andi Fahmi Lubis, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, dkk., 2017, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, KPPU, Jakarta

Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, 2011, EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW ANNUAL: 2001 Effective Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law, Hart Publishing, Oregon

Henry Campbell, 1991, Black’s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co, St. Paul Minnesota

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Joe Sims, Kathryn M. Fenton, dan David P. Wales, 2015, Overview of the U.S. Antitrust Law, USA, Practising Law Institute

Mustafa Kamal Rokan, 2012, Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Satjipto Raharjo, 2005, Masalah Penegakan Hukum: Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Sinar Biru, Bandung

Artikel

Charles E. Koob, David E. Vann, Jr. dan Arman Y. Oruc, “Developments in Private Enforcement of Competition of Laws – Introduction”, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett Llp Journal, 1 Agustus 2009

Donncadh Woods, Ailsa Sinclair, dan David Ashton, “Private Enforcement of Community Competition Law: Modernisation and The Road Ahead”, Competition Policy Newsletter, Februari 2004

Ilya R. Segal dan Michael D. Whinston, “Public vs. Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law: A Survey”, Stanford Law School, Oktober 2004

Kai Hüschelrath dan Heike Schweitzer, “Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe – Introduction and Overview, Springer”, Berlin, 2014

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015, Relationship Between Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement, OECD, Paris

Stephen Calkins, “Competition Law in the United States of America”, Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 07-04, April 2007

Subhan Amin, “Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat”, Vol. 8 No. 1, Februari 2019

Tihamer Toth, “The Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law Before and After the EU Directive – A Hungarian Perspective”, Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Desember 2016

Internet

Antonio Capobianco and Sunmi Lee, “Relationship Between Public and Private Antitrust Enforcement: Note by the Secretariat”, http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/COMP/WP3(2015)14&doclanguage=en, diakses pada 31 Oktober 2020

Daniel A. Crane, “Private Enforcement of U.S. Antitrust Law — A Comment on the U.S. Courts Data”, https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/private-enforcement-of-u-s-antitrust-law-a-comment-on-the-u-s-courts-data, diakses 3 Oktober 2020

Hukum Online, “KPPU Nyatakan Temasek Langgar UU Anti Monopoli”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol18017/kppu-nyatakan-temasek-langgar-uu-anti-monopoli/, diakses pada 31 Oktober 2020.

Joost Hermans, “Private Enforcement of Competition Law”, https://sites.google.com/site/privateenforcementcompetition/, diakses pada 30 November 2020.

Kurnia Sari Assiza, “Statistik KPPU”, https://money.kompas.com/read/2017/05/30/200000326/selama.17.tahun.kppu.terima.2.537.laporan.73.persen.terkait.tender, diakses pada tanggal 3 Oktober 2020

Peraturan

Indonesia, Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jakarta, 5 Maret 1999

Putusan Pengadilan:

Putusan Guagatan class action terhadap Temasek, 111/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.PST, 27 Januari 2010

Download

Share

COinS