•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study aims to reflect and expand the notion of modularity in architectural design methods. The discussion about modular architecture is certainly familiar across architectural discourse; where its universality has been repeatedly challenged by the post-modern movement. The study aims to unpack and rethink the method and significance of modularity, not only as a means of repetition but as a contextual design response. The study generate reflection towards two lodge architecture design projects. The architecture of lodge provides complexities with regard to various programmatic needs, temporal occupation, quick construction processes, and often deep connection to the surrounding environment. This study examines four reflective concepts which expand the idea and method of modularity in architecture. First, the roof modules in lodge architecture promotes efficient spatial programs. Secondly, the use of modularity allows parallel operation of the building and the construction process. Thirdly, modularity enables construction of architecture as parts constructing the whole, creating connection between spatial scales. Fourth, modularity constructs the inside and outside experience, providing connection with environmental context. This study offers a new perspective on repositioning and expanding modularity, not only as a means of repetition but also as a form of contextual design thinking.

First Page

36

Last Page

53

References

Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.

Arisya, K. F., & Suryantini, R. (2021). Modularity in design for disassembly (DfD): Exploring the strategy for a better sustainable architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738(1), Article 12024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012024

Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2019). Interiority: At the threshold. Interiority, 2(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v2i2.66

Bayliss, S., & Bergin, R. (2020). The modular housing handbook. Routledge.

Boettger, T. (2014). Threshold spaces: Transitions in architecture: Analysis and design tools. Birkhäuser.

Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Penguin.

Combes, L., & Bellomio, A. (1999). Creativity and modularity in architecture. AV0CAADSecond International Conference Proceedings. 160–171. https://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/5a48.content

Corbusier, L. (1986). Towards a new architecture. Dover Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7fSTvQIr7ngC

Corcuff, M.-P. (2012). Modularity and proportions in architecture and their relevance to a generative approach to architectural design. Nexus Network Journal, 14, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-011-0097-x

Dharmawan, C., & Alviano, M. (2019). Pre-fabricated material for modular house. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 662(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042020

Duffy, F. (1990). Measuring building performance. Facilities, 8(5), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002112

Foster, H. (Ed.). (1996). The crux of minimalism. In The return of the real: The Avante-Garde at the end of the century (pp. 35–70). The MIT Press.

Frampton, K. (2001). Studies in tectonic culture: The poetics of construction in nineteenth and twentieth century architecture (J. Cava, Ed.). The MIT Press.

Frampton, K. (2013). Bötticher, Semper and the tectonic: Core form and art form. In A. Ballantyne (Ed.), What is architecture? (pp. 138–152). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315012933

Graafland, A. (1996). Architectural bodies. 010 Publishers.

Gropius, W. (1965). The new architecture and the Bauhaus (P. M. Shand, Trans.). The MIT Press.

Gropius, W., & Wachsmann, K. (2021). The prefabrication of the dwelling. In G. Herbert (Ed.), The dream of the factory-made house (pp. 1–22). The MIT Press.

Hogan-O'Neill, W. (2021). Prefabricated and modular architecture: Aligning design with manufacture and assembly. The Crowood Press.

Jenks, C. (1999). Modern movements in architecture. Revista de Arquitectura, 1(1), 5–6. http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica/revistas_ucatolica/index.php/RevArq/article/view/975/1032

Krauss, R. E. (1986). The originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. The MIT Press.

Kurokawa, K. (1977). Metabolism in architecture. Studio Vista London.

Larson, M. S. (1993). Behind the postmodern facade: Architectural change in late twentieth-century America. University of California Press.

Lee, J., Son, J., Jeong, W., & Yi, J.-S. (2015). An economic feasibility analysis on the movable modular lodging buildings. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 16(5), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.5.012

Lehtonen, T. (2007). Designing modular product architecture in the new product development. [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University of Technology]. Trepo. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tty-200810021062

Musa, M. F., Yusof, M. R., Mohammad, M. F., & Samsudin, N. S. (2016). Towards the adoption of modular construction and prefabrication in the construction environment: A case study in Malaysia. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(13), 8122–8131. https://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_0716_4572.pdf

Plowright, P. (2014). Revealing architectural design: Methods, frameworks and tools. Routledge.

Pollio, V. (1914). Vitruvius: The ten books on architecture (M. H. Morgan, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Prayitno, B. (2018). Green modular concept of sustainable kampong cityblock in Indonesia. In W. L. Filho, J. Rogers, & U. Iyer-Raniga (Eds.), Sustainable development research in the Asia-Pacific region: Education, cities, infrastructure and buildings (pp. 509–523). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73293-0_30

Redyantanu, B. P. (2021). Going minimal: An exploration of reduction as a design method. ARSNET, 1(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v1i2.15

Rudofsky, B. (1987). Architecture without architects: A short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. UNM Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

Silva, M. F. (2020). Another way of living: The prefabrication and modularity toward circularity in the architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), Article 042048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042048

Smith, R. E. (2011). Prefab architecture: A guide to modular design and construction. John Wiley & Sons.

Sosa, M., Ahmad, L., & Musfy, K. (2022). Adaptive ephemeral interiority: Upcycling site specific interiors. Interiority, 5(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i2.186

Tamari, T. (2014). Metabolism: Utopian urbanism and the Japanese modern architecture movement. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414547777

Tschumi, B. (1996). Architecture and disjunction. The MIT Press.

van der Rohe, L. M., & Puente, M. (2008). Conversations with Mies van der Rohe. Princeton Architectural Press.

Venturi, R., Stierli, M., & Brownlee, D. B. (1977). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. The Museum of Modern Art.

Wallance, D. (2021). The future of modular architecture. Routledge.

Whitfield, R. C., Lin, L.-C., Noordzy, G., & Chirumiko, L. T. (2022). Developing the meridian adventure dive resort: A modular construction case study. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 22(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2022.2049435

Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., Saginatari, D. P., & Harahap, M. M. Y. (2021). Development of modular school design as a permanent solution for post-disaster reconstruction in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 12(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2019-0070

Author Biography

Bramasta Putra Redyantanu
Bramasta Putra Redyantanu is a graduate of Petra Christian University's Bachelor of Architecture programme and Institut Teknologi Bandung's Master of Architecture Design programme. He is currently employed as a lecturer at Petra Christian University. His passion for architecture compelled him to continue researching other design techniques, both academically and practically. His research interests include architecture and technology, urban spatial phenomena, and practical architectural design methods. He is currently pursuing a doctoral degree in architectural design cluster at Universitas Indonesia.

Rony Gunawan Sunaryo
Rony Gunawan Sunaryo is an esteemed academic with a robust architecture and urban design background, holding a doctoral degree from Gadjah Mada University. Since 2003, he has been imparting knowledge as a lecturer at Petra Christian University and presently serves as an Associate Professor at Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. His research delves into urban design and urban morphology. In his professional capacity, Rony leads rgA Studio as the Principal Architect, where he has successfully completed 122 projects, primarily focusing on the master plan and public facilities since 2005. His dedication to the field extends to his role as a committee member of two pivotal architectural organisations in Indonesia—the Indonesian Institute of Architects (IAI) and the Indonesian Association of School of Architecture (APTARI). Since 2012, he has been instrumental in bridging the gap between architectural education and practice in Indonesia.

Download

Share

COinS