•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Background: In 2022, the Indonesian Occupational Medicine Association (IOMA) collaborated with oil and gas companies and conducted a web-based seminar (webinar) to enable participants to recognize occupational disease earlier and enhance reporting in companies. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the webinar in increasing the intended knowledge.

Method: The webinar was separated into three batches, with different participants per batch. Using a one-group pretest-posttest design, we utilized secondary data from IOMA. The effectiveness of the webinar was determined by participants' satisfaction and knowledge as measured by pre-test and post-test. After performing item analysis, we removed poor discriminating items in pre-test and post-test (

Results: Data was gathered from 147 subjects (23.8%, 34%, and 42.2% of the three batches, respectively). Except for company status in the second batch (P = 0.045), there was no significant difference in initial knowledge based on the individual factors studied. Significant knowledge improvement was observed post-webinar in each batch compared to the initial. (P < 0.05). The correlation between satisfaction and post-test scores was negligible (r < 0.3; P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The initial knowledge of oil and gas company workers in early detection and reporting of OD was low (

References

  1. Piňosová M, Andrejiova M, Badida M, Moravec M. Occupational disease as the bane of workers’ lives: A chronological review of the literature and study of its development in Slovakia. Part 1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11). doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115910
  2. Levy BS, Wegman DH, Baron SL, Sokas RK, editors. Occupational and environmental health: Recognizing and preventing disease and injury. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2011.
  3. International Labour Organization. Global trends on occupational accidents and diseases [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/osh/en/story_content/external_files/fs_st_1-ILO_5_en.pdf.
  4. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. Profil keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja nasional Indonesia tahun 2022 [Internet]. [Indonesia's national occupational safety and health profile in 2022]. Jakarta: Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia; 2022. Available from: https://satudata.kemnaker.go.id/satudata-public/2022/10/files/publikasi/1675652225177_Profil%2520K3%2520Nasional%25202022.pdf. Indonesian.
  5. Kunarti S, Sudrajat T, Handayani SW. Transformation of Social Security Administrative Body (BPJS) within Social Security Reform in Indonesia. [cited 2023 Jul 23]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185403017.
  6. Statistics Indonesia. Number and percentage of working population and unemployed 2018-2019 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/6/1953/3/jumlah-dan-persentase-penduduk-bekerja-dan-pengangguran.html.
  7. Minister of Manpower Republic of Indonesia. National occupational safety and health (OSH) profile in Indonesia [Internet]. Jakarta; 2018. 1–58 p. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_711991.pdf.
  8. Harber P, Merz B. Time and knowledge barriers to recognizing occupational disease. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(3):285–8. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200103000-00019
  9. European Commission. Report on the current situation in relation to occupational diseases ’ systems in EU Member States and EFTA / EEA countries , in particular relative to Commission Recommendation 2003 / 670 / EC concerning the European Schedule of Occupational Diseases and. 2013;150.
  10. Geleta DH, Alemayehu M, Asrade G, Mekonnen TH. Low levels of knowledge and practice of occupational hazards among flower farm workers in southwest Shewa zone, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional analysis. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Jan 29];21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10254-5.
  11. Quaigrain RA, Owusu-Manu DG, Edwards DJ, Hammond M, Hammond M, Martek I. Occupational health and safety orientation in the oil and gas industry of Ghana: Analysis of knowledge and attitudinal influences on compliance. J Eng Des Technol. 2022; doi: 10.1108/JEDT-11-2021-0664
  12. Aluko OO, Adebayo AE, Adebisi TF, Ewegbemi MK, Abidoye AT, Popoola BF. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of occupational hazards and safety practices in Nigerian healthcare workers. BMC Res Notes. 2016; doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1880-2
  13. Yildiz AN, Piskin TM, Alaguney ME, Kurt OK, Ozlu A, Basarali MK. Attitudes and behaviors of family physicians regarding occupational diseases. Arch Environ Occup Heal. 2019 Mar 4;74(1–2):85–92. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2018.1436037
  14. Robson AL, Stephenson C, Schulte P, Amick B, Chan S, Clarke J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of training & education for the protection of workers [Internet]. Institute for Work & Health. Cincinnati; 2010. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2010-127/pdfs/2010-127.pdf.
  15. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy [Internet]. London; 2022. Available from: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf.
  16. Curti S, Sauni R, Spreeuwers D, De Schryver A, Valenty M, Rivière S, et al. Interventions to increase the reporting of occupational diseases by physicians: A Cochrane systematic review. Occup Env Med [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Jan 30];73:353–4. Available from: https://oem.bmj.com/content/73/5/353. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103209
  17. Kumar A, Kumar A, Panigrahi OP. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards occupational health hazards and safety measures among health care personnel working in public health facilities of Bhubaneswar Block, India. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2022;6(June):1597–609. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6ns5.8919
  18. Kirkpatrick D. Evaluating training program: The four-level. 2nd ed. California: Berret-Koehler Publisher; 1998.
  19. Yu Q. Factors influencing online learning satisfaction. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022 Apr 12 [cited 2023 Jan 28];13. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9039172/. doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2022.852360
  20. Lo C. How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning. J Scholarsh Teach Learn [Internet]. 2010;10(1):47–54. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ882125.
  21. She L, Ma L, Jan A, Sharif Nia H, Rahmatpour P. Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese university students: the serial mediation model. Front Psychol. 2021;12(October). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936
  22. Notoatmodjo S. Ilmu perilaku kesehatan. [Health behavior science]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2020. Indonesian.
  23. Notoatmodjo S. Kesehatan masyarakat: ilmu dan seni. [Public health: science and art]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2014. Indonesian.
  24. Jana M. Measuring knowledge. J Compet. 2016;8(4):5–29. doi: 10.7441/joc.2016.04.01
  25. Schrader PG, Lawless KA. The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Perform Improv. 2004;43(9):8–15. doi: 10.1002/pfi.4140430905
  26. Gajida AU, Ibrahim UM, Iliyasu Z, Jalo RI, Chiroma AK, Saidu FA. Knowledge of occupational hazards, and safety practices among butchers in Kano metropolis, Kano State, Nigeria. Pyramid J Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 29];2:43–8. Available from: https://www.pagepress.org/medicine/pjm/article/view/41/20.
  27. Ranti SNA. Influence of worker’s occupational safety and health knowledge to increase work safety in PT. Ganding Toolsindo [Internet]. [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Islam Indonesia; 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 5]. Available from: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/5887.
  28. Ichsan NP. Sistem pelaporan penyakit akibat kerja di kota administrasi Jakarta Utara (studi kasus) [Internet]. [Occupational disease reporting system in the administrative city of North Jakarta (case study)]. Universitas Padjadjaran; 2013. Available from: http://pustaka.unpad.ac.id/archives/128938. Indonesian.
  29. Notoatmodjo S. Metodologi penelitian kesehatan. [Health research methodology]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2010. Indonesian.
  30. Ebel RL, Frisbie DA. Essentials of educational measurement [Internet]. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1991. 1–383 p. Available from: https://ebookppsunp.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/robert_l-ebel_david_a-_frisbie_essentials_of_edbookfi-org.pdf.
  31. Mitra N, Nagaraja H, Ponnudurai G, Judson J. The Levels Of Difficulty And Discrimination Indices In Type A Multiple Choice Questions Of Pre-clinical Semester 1 Multidisciplinary Summative Tests. Int e-Journal Sci Med Educ. 2009;3(1):2–7. doi: 10.56026/IMU.3.1.2
  32. Rao C, Kishan Prasad H, Sajitha K, Permi H, Shetty J. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: Assessing an assessment tool in medical students. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2016; doi: 10.4103/2395-2296.186515
  33. Karelia B, Pillai A, Vegada B. The levels of difficulty and discrimination indices and relationship between them in four-response type multiple choice questions of pharmacology summative tests of Year II M.B.B.S students. Int e-Journal Sci Med Educ. 2013;7(2):41–6. doi: 10.56026/imu.7.2.41
  34. Budiman, Riyanto A. Kapita selekta kuesioner: Pengetahuan dan sikap dalam penelitian kesehatan. [Selected readings of questionnaire: Knowledge and attitudes in health research]. Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2013. Indonesian.
  35. Bloom BS. Learning for mastery. Eval Comment. 1968 May;1(2).
  36. Ebner C, Gegenfurtner A. Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: a meta-analysis. Front Educ. 2019 Sep 3;4:92. doi: 10.3389/FEDUC.2019.00092/BIBTEX

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.