•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study aims to determine and examine the relationship and influence of the Psychosocial Safety Climate on the incidence of workplace bullying at PT WID (a power generation company) involving six power plant work areas throughout Indonesia. Method: This was a cross-sectional study involving 100 workers in the power plant industry who were above 17 years of age and with a work experience of at least six months. These workers participated in this study by filling out the Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC 12) to measure the level of psychosocial safety climate and Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) to determine the incidence of bullying in companies Results: The results of the analysis show that the Psychosocial Safety Climate has a significant effect on the incidence of bullying in the workplace in the company, with a negative relationship direction and moderate strength(p-sig=0,003; r=0,292; ß=-0,257). In addition, the results of multiple linear regressions show that Management Commitment has a significant effect (p-sig = 0.013) on the decrease in bullying levels in the workplace, compared to Management Priority, Organizational Participation, and Organizational Communication. Conclusion: This shows that if there is an increase in one level of Psychosocial Safety Climate, there will be a decrease in bullying actions by 0.257. Where management commitment is the variable that has the most dominant influence on reducing the level of bullying in the workplace.

References

Akella, D. (2016). Workplace Bullying: Not A Manager’s Right? Journal of Workplace Right., 1-10.

Alterman, T., S.E., L., Dahlhamer, J., W. B., & Calvert, G. (2012). Job insecurity, work family imbalance and hostile work environment: prevalence data from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Ind Med.

Arenas, A., Giorgi, G., Montani, F., Mancuso, S., Perez, J. F., Mucci, N., & Arcangeli, G. (2016). Workplace Bullying in a Sample of Italian and Spanish Employees and Its Relationship with Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology., 6(1912), 1-10.

Bond, S. A., Tuckey, M. R., & Dollard, M. F. (2010). Psychosocial Safety Climate, Workplace Bullying and Symptomps of Posttraumatic Stress. Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 37.

Cheyne, A., Cox, S., Oliver, A., & Tomás, J. (1998). Modelling safety climate in the predictions of levels of safety activity. Work & Stress, 12, 255-271.

Commons, C. (2010). The Australian workplace barometer: Report on Psychosocial safety climate and worker health in Australia. Australia: safeworkaustralia.

Cooper, C., & Robertson, I. (2001). Well-being in organization. England: John Wiley&Sons, Ltd. 22

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.

Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as aprecursor to conducivework environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 579-599.

Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2012). Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand-resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 694–704.

Dollard, M., & Kang, S. (2007). Psychosocial Safety Culture and Climate survey. Adelaide: University of South Australia.

Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185-201.

Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, Second Edition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harrasment in the workplace (pp. 3-23). CRC Press.

Erwandi, D., Kadir, A., & Lestari, F. (2021). Identification of Workplace Bullying: Reliability and Validity of Indonesian Version of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3985).

Hall, G. B., Dollard, M. F., & Coward, J. (2010). Psychosocial Safety Climate: Development of the PSC-12. International Journal of Stress Management, 17, 353–383.

Hall, G. B., Dollard, M. F., & Coward, J. (2010). Psychosocial Safety Climate: Development of the PSC-12. International Journal of Stress Management, 17(4), 353-383.

Hidayati, L. (2016). PEMBULIAN DI TEMPAT KERJA DALAM KONTEKS ASIA- Workplace Bullying in Asia Context. Malang: Seminar Nasional dan Gelar Produk | SENASPRO .

Idris, M. A., Dollard, M. F., Coward, J., & Dormann, C. (2012). Psychosocial safety climate: Conceptual distinctiveness and effect on job demands and worker psychological health. Safety Science, 50, 19-28.

Jaafar, M., & Hiidzir, N. I. (2016). Factors of Sub-Contractor Workplace Bullying in the Construction Industry. Research Journal of Fisheries and Hydrobiology, 11(3), 255-260.

Jordon, J., Gurr, E., Tinline, G., Giga, S., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). Beacons of excellence in stress prevention. Manchester, UK: Robertson Cooper and UMIST.

Karabuluta, A. T. (2016). Bullying: harmful and hidden behavior in organizations . 23 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 229, 4-11.

Kompier, M., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Preventing stress, improving productivity: European case studies in the workplace. London, UK: Routledge.

Kompier, M., & Kristensen, T. S. (2001). Organizational work stress interventions in a theoretical, methodological and practical context. In Stress in the workplace: Past, present and future (pp. 164-190). London, UK: Whurr.

Law, R., Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2011). Psychosocial safety climate as a lead indicator of workplace bullying and harassment, job resources, psychological health and employee engagement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 1782-1793.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munandar, A. S. (2001). Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: UI Press. Robbins, S. (2003). Organizational Behavior (10th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Ueducation Inc.

Salin, D. (2014). Risk factors of workplace bullying for men and women: The role of the psychosocial and physical work environment. . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.

Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2015). WORKPLACE BULLYING: A Tale of Adverse Consequences. Innovations in CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 12, 32-37.

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organization Behavior, 34, 1-15.

Silviandari, I. A., & A. F. Helmi. (2018). Bullying di Tempat Kerja di Indonesia - Workplace Bullying on Indonesia. Buletin Psikologi, 26 (2), 137-145.

Work, E. A. (2012). Annual Report 2012 – Summary. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Yahaya, A., Ing, T. C., Lee, G. M., Yahaya, N., Boon, Y., Hashim, S., & Taa, S. (2012). The Impact of Workplace Bullying on Work Performance. Archives Des Sciences, 65(4), 18-28.

Yeun, Y. R., & Han, J. W. (2016). Effect of Nurses’ Organizational Culture, Workplace Bullying and Work Burnout on Turnover Intention. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 8(1), 372-380.

Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96-102.

Bahasa Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji hubungan serta pengaruh Iklim Keselamatan Psikososial terhadap kejadian perundungan di tempat kerja di PT WID (perusahaan pembangkit tenaga listrik) yang melibatkan enam area kerja pembangkit listrik di seluruh Indonesia. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan studi potong lintang (cross-sectional study) dengan melibatkan 100 orang tenaga kerja di lini bisnis Operational & Maintenance yang memiliki usia di atas 17 tahun dan pengalaman kerja minimal 6 bulan, untuk ikut berpartisipasi dalam pengisian kuesioner Psychosocial Safety Climate (PSC 12) untuk mengukur tingkat iklim keselamatan psikososial dan Negative Acts Qustionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) untuk mengatahui tingkat kejadian perundungan di perusahaan. Hasil: Hasil analisa menunjukkan bahwa Iklim Keselamatan Psikososial berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap tingkat kejadian perundungan di tempat kerja di perusahaan, dengan arah hubungan negatif dan berkekuatan sedang (p-sig=0,003; r=0,292; ß=-0,257). Selain itu hasil uji regresi linear berganda menunjukkan bahwa Komitmen Manajemen memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan (p-sig= 0,013) terhadap penurunan tingkat perundungan di tempat kerja, dibandingkan Prioritas Manajemen, Partisipasi Organisasi dan Komunikasi Organisasi. Simpulan: Hal ini menunjukkan jika terjadi kenaikan satu tingkat Iklim Keselamatan Psikososial maka terjadi penurunan Tindakan perundungan sebesar 0,257. Dimana Komitmen manajemen menjadi variable yang memiliki pengaruh paling dominan terhadap penurunan tingkat perundungan di tempat kerja.

Kata kunci: Iklim Keselamatan Psikososial, Perundungan di tempat kerja, bahaya psikososial, manajemen stres.

Download

Share

COinS