Abstract
The prevailing scholarly consensus maintains that Australia’s rising threat perception of China influenced its decision to re-join the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) in 2017. Although the minilateral initiative does not have a declared policy to inhibit China’s influence or curtail China’s aggressive behaviour in the Indo-Pacific region, scholars assert that the underlying rationalisation for its resurgence in the present context is due to China’s behaviour. The paper tests this hypothesis by examining whether Australia’s threat perception of China is manifest in its defence white papers and defence updates from 2000 to 2016. Having reviewed this primary material, the author concludes that Australia’s threat perception of China increased over time from the early 2000s. In particular, increased attention to China’s activities in the South Asia and Southeast Asia as well as Australia’s decision to closely observe the bilateral relationship between the United States and China after 2008, manifests Australia’s increased threat perception of China. This is also supported by Lowy Polls between 2000 and 2016. In sum, the paper concludes that Australia’s rising threat perception of China appears to have been a major factor influencing its decision to re-join the Quad in 2017.
References
References
Andrews, E. M. (1985). Australia and China: The ambiguous relationship. Melbourne University Press.
Australian Defense Update (2003). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Defense Update (2005). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia
Australian Defense Update (2007). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Defense White Paper (2013). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Defense White Paper (2016). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Campbell, K., Patel, N. & Singh, V. (2011). The power of balance: America in Asia. Center for a New American Security.
CFR (n.a), China’s Maritime Disputes, https://www.cfr.org/timeline/chinas-maritime-disputes.
Crisis Group (n.a), The recent history of the South China Sea: A Timeline, https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/south-china-sea/recent-history-south-china-sea-timeline.
CSIS (n.a), Are Maritime Law Enforcement forces destabilizing Asia? https://csis-ilab.github.io/cpower-viz/csis-china-sea/.
De Silva, S. (forthcoming). Quad 1.0 to Quad 2.0: Destined to dissipate like sea foam? Yonsei Journal of International Studies.
Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030. (2009). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Hanson, F. (2008). Australia and the World: Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Hanson, F. (2012). Australia and New Zealand in the World: Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Jaishankar, D. (2017). It's time to resuscitate the Asia-Pacific Quad. Brookings Blog. <https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2017/01/09/its-time-to-resuscitate-the-asia-pacific-quad/>.
Jie, Z. (2019). The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and Reconstruction of Asia-Pacific Order. China International Studies, 74, 55-73.
Johanson, K., Coles, A., Glow, H., & Vincent, C. (2019) Controversy, uncertainty and the diverse public in cultural diplomacy: Australia–China relations, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 73(4), 397-413.
Jung, S., Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2021). The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(127), 53-68.
Kent, A. (1996). Australia- China relations, 1966-1996: A Critical Review. Australian Journal of Politics and History. 42(3), 365-384.
Kizekova, A. (2021). Taking stock of Australia’s asymmetrical relations with China: interdependence, tensions and new dimensions. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 20(2), 197-209.
Kliem, F. (2020). Why Quasi alliances will persist in the IndoPacific: The fall and rise of the Quad. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 7(3), 271-304.
Korolev, A., & Pan, G. (2021). The struggle for certainty: Ontological security, the rise of nationalism and Australia-China tensions after Covid-19. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26, 115-138.
Liu, K. (2022). The Global Times and the China Threat Narrative: An empirical analysis. Journal of Chinese political science 27(1), 1-18.
Mackerras, C. (2014). China and the Australia-U.S. Relationship: A Historical Perspective. Asian Survey 54(2), 223-246.
McCarthy G., & Song, X. (2018). China in Australia: The discourses of Changst. Asian Studies Review, 42(2), 323-341.
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.
Medcalf, R. (2020). Contest for the Indo-Pacific: Why China won’t map the future. La Trobe University Press.
Oliver, A. (2018). Understanding Australian Attitudes to the World: The Lowy Institute Poll. Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Our Future Defense (2000). Ministry of Defense Commonwealth of Australia.
Pattanaik, S. (2016). Indian Ocean in the emerging geo-strategic context: Examining India’s relations with its maritime South Asian neighbours. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 12(2), 126-142.
Pitty, R. (2003). Facing North, A century of Australian Engagement with Asia. Melbourne University Press.
Quad Joint Statement. (2021). The Spirit of the Quad. White House Briefing Room. <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/>
Rai, A. (2018). Quadrilateral Security Dialogue 2 (Quad 2.0) – a credible strategic construct or mere “foam in the ocean”?. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India 14(2), 138-148.
Salman, M., Pieper, M. & Geeraerts G. (2015). Hedging in the Middle East and China-U.S. Competition. Asian Politics & Policy 7(4), 575–596.
Tow, W. (2019). Minilateral security's relevance to US strategy in the Indo-Pacific: challenges and prospects. The Pacific Review 32(2), 232-244.
Recommended Citation
De Silva, Shakthi
(2023)
"Quad 2.0: Australia’s reaction to the ‘China threat’,"
Journal of Strategic and Global Studies: Vol. 6:
Iss.
1, Article 2.
DOI: 10.7454/jsgs.v6i1.1103
Available at:
https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jsgs/vol6/iss1/2