•  
  •  
 
Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to examine whether the health variable as proxied by government health insurance participation and the infrastructure variable as a proxy for steady road conditions were correlated with the electability of political dynasties in the district/city elections in Indonesia in 2017-2020. This study tested using an average of 5 years before the 2017, 2018 and 2020 elections and the sample used was 508 districts/cities. This study uses a probit and a heck-probit regression model. The results of the selection bias control show that the health interest variable, namely BPJS Non-PBI, significantly reduces the probability of being elected to a political dynasty. This negative direction is a form of retrospective economic voting in political dynasties. Voters consider that the government has no role in providing free health facilities. Voters must pay BPJS Non-PBI membership dues through their employers or pay them independently. Meanwhile, the infrastructure interest variable in the form of steady road conditions significantly increases the probability of being elected to a political dynasty. This indicates that improving road conditions is effective in increasing the electability of political dynasties and the community makes road conditions a tool for retrospective economic voting in political dynasties.

Bahasa Abstract

Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji apakah variabel kesehatan dan variabel infrastruktur berkorelasi pada keterpilihan dinasti politik di pilkada Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia tahun 2017-2020. Penelitian ini menguji dengan menggunakan data rata-rata 5 tahun sebelum pilkada 2017, 2018 dan 2020 dan sample yang digunakan adalah 508 Kabupaten/Kota yang mengikuti pilkada. Penelitian ini menggunakan model regresi probit dan model regresi heckprobit untuk menguji apakah probabilita keterpilihan dinasti politik dipengaruhi oleh variabel kesehatan yang diproksikan oleh kepersertaan jaminan kesehatan milik pemerintah dan variabel infrastruktur yang diproksikan kondisi jalan mantap. Hasil kontrol selection bias menunjukan bahwa interest variable kesehatan yaitu BPJS Non-PBI signifikan menurunkan probabilita keterpilihan dinasti politik. Arah negatif ini merupakan bentuk retropective economic voting pada dinasti politik, dimana setiap kenaikan 1% kepesertaan BPJS Non-PBI menurunkan probabilita keterpilihan dinasti politik. Voters menganggap bahwa pemerintah tidak memiliki peran dalam penyediaan fasilitas kesehatan yang gratis. Voters harus membayar iuran kepesertaan BPJS Non-PBI melalui pemberi kerja atau membayar sendiri secara mandiri. Sedangkan interest variable infrastruktur berupa kondisi jalan mantap signifikan meningkatkan probabilita keterpilihan dinasti politik. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa politik perbaikan kondisi jalan efektif meningkatkan elektabilitas dinasti politik dan masyarakat menjadikan kondisi jalan sebagai alat retrospective economic voting pada dinasti politik.

References

Asako, Y., Iida, T., Matsubayashi, T. & Ueda, M. (2015) Dynastic Politicians: Theory and Evidence from Japan, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16, pp. 5-32.

Aspinall E. & As’ad M.U. (2016) Understanding Family Politics: Successes and Failures of Political Dynasties in Regional Indonesia. South East Asia Research. 24(3), pp. 420-435.

Besley, T. & Reynal-Querol, M. (2015) The Logic of Hereditary Rule: Theory and Evidence, Mimeo, LSE.

Besley, T. & Case, A. (1995) Incumbent Behavior: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 85 (1), pp. 25–45.

Besley, T. & Smart, M. (2007) Fiscal Restraints and Voter Welfare. J. Publ. Econ. 91 (3), pp. 755–773.

BPJS Kesehatan, 2020. Panduan Layanan Bagi Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional- Kartu Indonesia Sehat (JKN-KIS). Edisi Tahun 2020.

Bragança, A., Ferraz, C. & Rios, J. (2015) Political Dynasties and The Quality of Government.

Buehler, M. (2013) Married With Children. Inside Indonesia 112: Apr-Jun 2013.

Dal Bo, E., Dal Bo, P. & Snyder, J. (2009) Political Dynasties, The Review of Economic Studies, 76, pp 115-142.

Daniele, G., Romarri A. & Vertier, P. (2021) Dynasties and policymaking, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 190, pp. 89-110.

Fadhillah, D. N., Ramadhan, F. & Dewa, T. T. (2020) Riset Nagara Institute: Dinasti Politik Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020. Nagara Institute.

Firdaus, F.R., Adakah Larangan Politik Dinasti di Indonesia? https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/adakah-larangan-politik-dinasti-di-indonesia-lt61d2a96ed01b1

Fiva, J.H. & Smith, D.M. (2016). ‘Political dynasties and the incumbency advantage in party-centered environments’, Working Paper Series No. 5757, CESifo.

Fowler,Anthony, & Andrew B. Hall (2014) Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages:Evidence from Close Elections and Term Limits. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9 (4), pp. 501–31.

George, S.E. & Ponattu, D. (2018) How Do Political Dynasties Affect Economic Development? Theory and Evidence from India.

Geys, B. & Smith, D.M. (2017) Political Dynasties in Democracies: Causes Consequences and Remaining Puzzles, The Economic Journal, 127, pp. 446-454.

Kenawas. Y.C. (2015) The Rise of Political Dynasties in a Democratic Society. Arryman Fellow Symposium, Juni 2015.

Kiewiet D., Roderick. (2000) Economic Retrospective Voting and Incentives For Policymaking, Electoral Studies 19, pp. 427-444.

Kurtz II, Donn M. (1989) The Political Family: A Contemporary View, Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 331-352.

Leigh, A. & McLeish, M. (2009) Are state elections affected by the national economy? Evidence from Australia. Econ. Rec. 85 (269), pp. 210–222.

Lewis-Beck, M.S. & Paldam, M,. (2000) Economic Voting: An Introduction, Electoral Studies 19. Pp. 113-121.

Lewis-Beck, M.S. & Stegmaier, M,. (2000) Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes, Annual Review of Political Science, 3, pp. 183-219.

Lewis-Beck, M.S.& Stegmaier, M,. (2007) Economic Models of Voting, The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior.

Lewis-Beck. M. (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press.

Mendoza, R.U., Beja, E.Jr., Venida, V,S. &Yap, D.B. (2012) Inequality in Democracy: Insight From An Empirical Analysis of Political Dynasties In The 15th Philippine Congress, MPRA Paper No. 40104.

Nugroho, Y., Kenawas, Y.C. & Syarief. S.S. (2021) ISEAS Perspective 2021/5 How the 2020 Pilkada Reflected Major Structural Flaws in Indonesian Politics. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute

Oliver, J.E & Ha, S.E. (2007) Vote Choice in Suburban Elections, American Political Science Review, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 393-408.

Parker, G.R. (1996) Congress and The Rent-Seeking Society, Ann harbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. (2000) Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. MIT press, Massachusetts.

Powell, G.B. & Whitten, G. (1993) A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting Taking Account of The Political Context. American Journal of Political Science 37, pp. 391–414.

Purwaningsih, T. & Widodo, B.E.C. (2020) The Interplay of Incumbency, Political Dinasty and Corruption in Indonesia: Are Political Dynasties The Cause of Corruption in Indonesia?, Unisci Journal No. 53, pp. 157-176.

Pusat Studi Transportasi dan Logistik Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2022. Menyoal Pemeliharaan Rutin Jalan. https://pustral.ugm.ac.id/2022/05/30/menyoal-pemeliharaan-rutin-jalan/

Querubin, P. (2016) Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in The Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11, pp. 151-181.

Rossi, M.A. (2017) Self-perpetuation of Political Power, Economic Journal, vol. 127(605), pp. F455–73.

Rumayya, Rammohan, A., Purwono, R. & Harymawan, I. (2020) The Local Economy and Re-election of Incumbent District Leaders in Indonesia, Heliyon 6, e04098.

Salmon, P. (1987) Decentralisation as an incentive scheme. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Pol. 3 (2), pp. 24–43.

Setyaningrum, D. & Saragih, H.A. (2019) Political Dynasties and the Moderating Role of Good Public Governance, Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8, pp. 135-144.

Simanjuntak. D. (2021) Direct Elections, Patronage, and The Failure of Party Cadre-ship: Dynastic Politics in Indonesia. Heinrich Bӧll Stiftung Southeast Asia Regional Office.

Smith, D.M. (2012) Succeeding in Politics : Dynasties in Democracies, UC San Diego.

Sutisna. A. (2017) The Proliferation Symptoms of Political Dynasties in Banten Under The Era of Governor Ratu Atut Chosiyah’s. Diponegoro Law Review, Volume 02 Number 02

Van Coppenolle, B. (2017) ‘Political dynasties in the UK House of Commons: The null effect of narrow electoral selection’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, forthcoming.

Wolfers, J. (2007) Are Voters Rational? Evidence from Gubernatorial Elections.Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania.

Download

Share

COinS