•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Observing the workings of law in Indonesia is very intriguing, particularly regarding corporations in the era of globalization. In this context, the refunctionalization of law in the enforcement of corporate law is interpreted as a process of legal renewal and a part of a progressive and reformative legal political process. In this regard, the legal interpretation of corporate liability principles becomes the main focus of this dissertation. It appears that corporate liability, which is key to prosecuting corporations, still requires more serious efforts to be articulated in practical terms, leading to fair judicial decisions for both the corporation itself and the victims of corporate crimes. This situation drives the researcher to examine the issues of (a) How judges’ Ratio Decidendi interprets corporate liability, and (b) How the element of corporate fault should be interpreted in judges’ Ratio Decidendi to improve the regulatory provisions regarding corporate liability. The research method applied in this study is normative legal research. The statutory approach is used by reviewing all regulations related to the legal issue being studied, namely corporate liability. The conceptual approach is used as an argument to solve problems based on doctrines to better understand the basic ideas, legal concepts, and legal principles relevant to the issue. The method of interpretation often found in various criminal law literature is discussed. The research results affirm that legal interpretation and construction can be seen as ways for judges and other legal officers to discover the law. There is a difference in character between civil law and common law experts when discussing legal discovery. Thus, this study attempts to apply the use of the term Ratio Decidendi in the Indonesian criminal legal system, particularly in interpreting corporate liability.

References

Ali, Achmad. Menguak Tabir Hukum: Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis. Jakarta: PT Toko Gunung Agung, 2002. Allen, Michael J. Texbook On Criminal Law. London: Blackstore Press Limited, 1997. Apeldron, Van. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Terjemahan Oetard Sadini. Jakarta: Pradnya Pranata, 1990. Berman, Harold J. “The Wester Legal Tradition In A Millenial Perpective: Past and Future.” Lousina Review, 2000. Clinard, Marshall B., and Yeager, Peter C. Corporate Crime. London: Collar Macmillan Publishers, 1980. Dwija Priyatno, Kristian. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Ditinjau dari teori dan konsep, pendapat para ahli, pertimbangan hakim, dan yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2020. Hadjon, Philipus M., and Djatmiati, Tatiek Sri. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2005. Huibers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum Dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1982. Kadish, Sanford H. Encyclopedia of Crime And Justice. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1983. Kavanagh, Ailen, and Oberdiek, John, eds. Arguing About Law. London and New York: Routledge, 2009. Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the problem of legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Priytno, Dwija. Pembaharuan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif Justice Dalam Model Dual Track System Selective. Pidato Pengukuhan, Disampaikan pada upacara penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Pidana pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 17 Desember 2019. Semarang: Undip Press, 2019. Rahardo, Satjipto. Sisi – Sisi Lain dari Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006. Saleh, Roesian. Tentang Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: BPHN, 1984. Shidarta. Filosofi Penalaran Hukum Konstitusi Dalam Masa Transisi Konstitusionalitas. Jurnal Hukum Jentera Edisi 11 Tahun III, Januari – Maret, 2006. Simanjutak, Effendi. The Interview Results with Effendi Simanjutak, Lawyer in Jakarta, on September 4, 2017. Soekanto, Soerjono. Teori Sosiologi tentang Pribadi dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982. Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto. Hukum : Paradigma Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam Lembaga Studi Dan Advokasi Masyarakat, 2002. Sulistyono, Adi. Krisis Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia. Surakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan (LPP) UNS dan UPT Penelitian dan Percetakan UNS, 2006. “MK menolak gugatan Uji Materi Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2012 Tentang APBN-P 2012 yang menjadi dasar pemberian dana APBN untuk penanggulangan kasus Lapindo yang diajukan oleh Tjuk Sukiadi, Ali Akbar Azhar dan Letjen TNI Marinir (purn.) Suharto.” www.mahkamahkonstitusi. go.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_sidang_53%20PUU%202012-telah%20 baca%2013%20Des%202012.pdf. Firman Firdausi dan Asih Widi Lestari, Eksistensi “White Collar Crime” di Indonesia: Kajian Kriminologi menemukan upaya preventif, Jurnal Reformasi, E-ISSN 2407- 6864 Vol. 6, No 1 tahun 2016. Satria, Hariman. Application of Additional Criminal Sanctions in Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Crimes, Review of Verdict No. 1554 K/Pid.Sus/2015, Judicial Journal Vol.10 No. 2 August 2017:155-157. Shkira, Elidiana. Criminal Liability of Corporations (A Comparative Approach to Corporate Criminal Liability in Common Law band Civil Law Countries). Yusuf Shofie. Pelaku Usaha, Konsumen dan Tindak Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002.

Download

Included in

Criminal Law Commons

Share

COinS